Home > Activity Overview > "Non-Lethal" Weapons

Geneva Forum Activities
"Non-Lethal" Weapons

Index

19 May 2010 Unconventional weapons: ethics, politics and law of the new technologies of violence
26 November 2009 ‘Humane’ Violence? ‘Non-lethal’ Weapons in Policy, Practice and Law
11 March 2004 Non-Lethal” Weapons: Emerging Technologies and their Consequences for International Law

 

Date

Theme

Speakers/Participants

19 May 2010 Unconventional weapons: ethics, politics and law of the new technologies of violence

Current civilian and military advancements are enabling substantial capabilities for developing technologies of violence applicable in both armed conflict and law enforcement contexts. Theoretically designed to reduce deaths and injury, these are highly susceptible to misuse and abuse, especially in a situation where oversight frameworks can hardly keep the pace with the speed of technological change.

Are these new weapons – variously labelled as ‘sub-lethal’, ‘non-lethal’ or, more generally ‘unconventional’ – redesigning existing standards of cruelty and democracy? Are current oversight mechanisms sufficient to prevent abuse of emerging human control and incapacitating technologies?

The Geneva Forum organized a lunchtime seminar that explored these and other questions relating to the legal, ethical and political accountability of the new technologies of violence.

 

Chair:

Silvia Cattaneo, Coordinator, Geneva Forum

 

Speakers:

Neil Davison, Royal Society

 

Steve Wright, Leeds Metropolitan University

 

Juergen Altmann, Dortmund University

 

26 November 2009 ‘Humane’ Violence? ‘Non-lethal’ Weapons in Policy, Practice and Law

This lunchtime seminar explored some of the political, technological and legal issues linked to ‘non-lethal’ weapons. Michael Crowley, Project Coordinator of the Bradford Non-lethal Weapons Research Project (University of Bradford, UK) spoke of the dangers of unresolved ambiguities and limits in the regulation of incapacitates and riot control agents under the Chemical Weapons Convention.

Neil Davison, Senior Policy Adviser (Royal Society, UK) addressed some of the wider policy issues associated with the development of a range of ‘non-lethal’ weapons. He also discussed specific concerns and issues around electrical weapons such as the taser, directed energy, and acoustic weapons by highlighting key areas requiring the attention of policy makers
 

Chair:

David Atwood, Director, QUNO

 

Speakers:

Michael Crowley, Project Coordinator, Non-lethal Weapons Research Project, University of Bradford

 

Neil Davison, Senior Policy Adviser, Royal Society

 

11 March 2004

Report available

Non-Lethal” Weapons: Emerging Technologies and their Consequences for International Law

The term “non-lethal” weapon is among the most controversial in international and domestic security circles. For some, “non-lethal” weapons offer the reassuring possibility of minimising injury among soldiers and civilians in situations of international and domestic conflict. Others see them as providing a means for oppressing domestic populations, for incapacitating combatants prior to killing them, or for inflicting pain, suffering and, despite their name, death.

“Non-lethal” weapons technologies have undergone significant advancement in recent years. The result has been the development of weapons that, until recently, might have been dismissed as being in the realm of science fiction. Examples are weapons systems that rely on high power microwave, laser, vortex generators, strong odours, light or noise to incapacitate opponents, temporarily or otherwise.

Important legal questions surround the development and deployment of such weapons. “Non-lethal” weapons systems that rely on biochemical processes have obvious implications for the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC). Weapons that may be deemed to cause unnecessary suffering or to have indiscriminate effects fall under the purview of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW). In addition, questions of international humanitarian and human rights law are relevant to the debate on “non-lethal” weapons.

This seminar used as the basis of its discussion the most recent report of the Non-Lethal Weapons Research Project of the University of Bradford in the UK. The report’s co-authors, Mr. Neil Davison and Prof. Nick Lewer of Bradford University, presented an overview of emerging “non-lethal” technologies. Dr. Robin Coupland, Medical Advisor at the ICRC, addressed, from the perspective of international humanitarian law, some of the concerns raised by the development and deployment of such weapons.

 

Prof. Nick Lewer, Director, Non-lethal Weapons Research Project, University of Bradford.

Mr. Neil Davison, Project Coordinator, Non-lethal Weapons Research Project, University of Bradford.

Dr. Robin Coupland, Medical Advisor, International Committee of the Red Cross.


The Geneva Forum
Pavillon Rigot, Avenue de la Paix 11a, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
Phone: +41 22 908 5932; Fax: +41 22 733 3049; Email: Silvia.Cattaneo@graduateinstitute.ch; Web: www.geneva-forum.org