|
Home > Activity
Overview > Small Arms > The
Geneva Process > Activities
The
Geneva Process on Small Arms
Activities
| Date |
Theme |
Speakers/Participants |
| 22 April 2008 |
Geneva Process on Small Arms
This was a special meeting of the Geneva Process timed to coincide
with the second visit to Geneva of Ambassador Dalius Cekuolis of
Lithuania in his capacity of Chair-designate of the 3rd biennial
meeting of States to consider implementation of the UN Programme
of Action.
The meeting focused
on the role of the four Facilitators appointed by Ambassador Cekuolis
in preparing, structuring and
following up
on the substantive discussions that will take place at the biennial
meeting on (1) International cooperation and assistance and national
capacity-building; (2) illicit brokering; (3) stockpile management
and surplus disposal, and (4) the International Tracing Instrument.
We invited the facilitators on each of these issues – Colombia,
Republic of Korea, Switzerland and Egypt, respectively – to
brief us on their plans in this regard. Our meeting also explored
how to transform the substantive discussions at the biennial meeting
into concrete, action-oriented outcomes and how the Geneva Process
might be able to assist and support the Facilitators in their important
task. |
Chair:
Ambassador Kari Kahiluoto
Permanent Representative of Finland to the Conference on Disarmament
Speaker:
Ambassador Dalius Cekuolis
Permanent Representative of Lithuania to the United Nations in New York; Chair-designate
of the third biennial meeting of States
Ambassador Clemencia Forero Ucros
Permanent Represntative of
Colombia to the UN
Mr. Reto Wollenmann
Counsellor of Military Affairs, Delegation of Switzerland to the
Conference on Disarmament
Ms. Angela Robinson of Australia
Acting Coordinator of the Working
Group on BMS, Third Secretary, Permanent Mission of Australia to the
UN
|
5
February
2008
|
Geneva
Process on Small Arms
The meeting was dedicated
to an informal discussion with the Chair-designate of the third
biennial meeting of States, Ambassador Dalius Cekuolis, Permanent
Representative of Lithuania to the United Nations in New York,
who was in Geneva to conduct open-ended consultations. In order
not to duplicate the general discussions that may take place
during his open-ended consultations, our meeting focused specifically
on the important question of identifying priority issues for
the biennial meeting, as stipulated by the 62nd UN General Assembly
small arms omnibus resolution (A/RES/62/47).
|
Chair:
Ambassador Kari
Kahiluoto
Permanent Representative of Finland to the Conference
on Disarmament
Speaker:
Ambassador Dalius Cekuolis
Permanent Representative of
Lithuania to the United Nations in New York; Chair-designate
of the third biennial meeting of States
|
11 December
2007
|
Geneva Process on Small Arms
The substantive focus of the meeting was on ammunition tracing.
We also took the opportunity to review small arms-related work
in this year’s First Committee and assess its implications
for how the Geneva Process should carry out its work during 2008,
in particular in the run-up to the July 14-18 biennial meeting
of States.
Time was reserved at the end of the meeting for reports and updates
from participants on recent and upcoming events and activities
related to the implementation of the UN Programme of Action.
|
Chair:
Mr. Tim Caughley
Director,
Geneva Branch, UN Office for Disarmament Affairs
Speaker:
Mr.
James Bevan
Researcher at the Small Arms Survey
|
| 4 October 2007 |
Geneva Process on Small Arms Following on from the substantive focus of the previous meeting
on transfer controls and diversion, we briefly reviewed the Canadian
Informal Meeting on Transfer Control Principles for Small Arms
and Light Weapons, held in Geneva on August 27-31, and discussed
its contribution to implementing the UN Programme of Action’s
provisions on this issue.
The main focus of the meeting was on the report and recommendations
of the Group of Governmental Experts on Illicit Brokering in SALW
(A/62/163 of 27 July 2007) and, more specifically, on how these
recommendations could best be implemented. The main speakers presented
the report.
Time at the end of the meeting was reserved for reports and updates
from participants on recent and upcoming events related to the
implementation of the UN Programme of Action on small arms.
|
Chair:
Mr. Tim Caughley
Director, Geneva Branch, UN Office
for Disarmament Affairs
Speakers:
Mr. Daniël Prins
Chair of the Group of Government Experts on Illicit Brokering of
Small Arms and Light Weapons; Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Mr. Brian Wood
Consultant
to the Group of Governmental Experts; Research Manager, Amnesty International
|
| 24 August 2007 |
Geneva Process on Small Arms
The meeting was chaired by Mr. Tim Caughley, Director of the Geneva Branch
of the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, who took over from
Ambassador Millar of Australia and who coordinated the work of the Geneva
Process for the remainder of this year.
The substantive focus of the meeting was on transfer controls. Mr. Nicholas
Marsh of the International Peace Research Institute, Oslo, made a presentation
on the modalities and responses to the diversion of small arms into the illicit
trade. Also, following up on the brief initial presentation of the working
group papers at the last Geneva Proces meeting, a more in-depth discussion
of the paper presented by the working group on biennial meetings of States
took place.
This was also a brief update from the omnibus resolution co-authors on progress
with the year’s main First Committee resolution on small arms and light
weapons.
|
Chair:
Mr. Tim Caughley
Director, Geneva Branch, UN Office for Disarmament Affairs
Speakers:
Mr. Nicholas Marsh,
Project Leader and Researcher,
Norwegian Initiative on Small Arms Transfers, International Peace Research
Institute, Oslo
|
| 19 June 2007 |
Geneva
Process on Small Arms
The first part of the meeting was devoted to reports from the
Coordinators of the two Geneva Process working groups on, respectively,
improving the effectiveness of biennial meetings of States and
improving mechanisms for assessing needs and matching them with
resources in the context of implementing the Programme of Action.
In the second part of the meeting, we heard a presentation from
Mr. Richard Kidd of the U.S. State Department on small arms surplus
destruction and stockpile management.
|
Chair:
H.E. Ms. Caroline Millar
Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Australia to the United Nations
Invited Speaker:
Mr. Richard Kidd
Director, Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement, Bureau of
Political & Military
Affairs, U.S. Department of State
|
| 16 April 2007 |
Geneva
Process on Small Arms
The substantive core of the meeting focussed on small arms export
and brokering controls. Mr. Ted Seay, Senior Political Advisor
with the Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls for Conventional
Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies shared experiences on
these subjects.
The Coordinators of the Geneva Process working groups on needs
and resources (Colombia) and
biennial meetings of States (Finland) provided updates on the work
of their respective groups,
which were established at the last meeting at the end of February.
|
Chair:
H.E. Ms. Caroline Millar
Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Australia to the United Nations
Invited Speaker:
Mr. Ted Seay
Senior Political Advisor, Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls
for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies
|
26 February 2007
|
Geneva
Process
on Small Arms
This meeting
was designed to inform about the launch of a renewed and strengthened “Geneva process” to
promote effective implementation of the UN Programme of Action
to Prevent, Combat
and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons
in All Its Aspects (PoA).
The initiative
being launched by the Geneva Forum aims to provide States committed
to addressing small arms proliferation and misuse
with a forum in which they can make real progress towards
achieving specific objectives; namely:
- To
promote, monitor and assess progress towards effective implementation
of the PoA, especially by States participating in
the initiative.
- To help
develop effective mechanisms for assessing needs and matching
them with resources to facilitate PoA implementation.
- To develop options and proposals for making biennial meetings
of States as effective as possible in promoting PoA implementation
and in advancing understanding of the small arms
problem
worldwide.
- To coordinate
and share information on relevant national, regional and global
initiatives related to PoA implementation
in order to promote and capture synergies across regions
and processes.
|
Chair:
H.E. Ms. Caroline Millar
Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Australia to the United Nations
|
| |
Beginning of Phase II of the Geneva Process on Small Arms
|
|
| 25 September 2006 |
29th
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of
the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms
Following the disappointing outcome of the PoA Review Conference,
this meeting focused on learning from what went wrong, identifying
promising avenues for future action based on agreements almost
reached at the Review Conference, and discussing draft resolutions
relating to small arms to be introduced at First Committee.
|
Chair:
Dr. David Atwood,
Director, Quaker
United Nations Office
Participants:
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bradford University, Canada, China,
European Commission, Finland, France, Germany, Groupe de Recherche
et d'Information sur la Paix et la Sécurité (GRIP), Centre for Humanitarian
Dialogue, International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA), International
Committe of the Red Cross (ICRC), India, Israel, Japan, The Netherlands,
New Zealand, Norway, Oxfam, Programme for Strategic and International
Security Studies (PSIS), Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO), Russia,
Small Arms Survey (SAS), Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United
nations Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA), United Nations
Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Institute for Disarmament
Research (UNIDIR), United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC),
USA, World Council of Churches (WCC), World Health Organisation (WHO) |
| 2 May 2006 |
28th
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the
UN Programme of Action on Small Arms
The meeting was divided into four parts. The first part focused on
the issue of small arms and development.
In
advance of the release of the President-designate’s fourth
non-paper on “follow-up,” the second part of the
meeting focused on the preferences of Geneva Process participants
regarding
how best to follow up on the work of the first Review Conference,
including such issues as implementation reporting, intersessional
meetings of States, a further Review Conference, etc.
The third part of the meeting was designed to provide participants
with an opportunity to share and discuss draft language that
they are preparing for any part of the Review Conference
outcome document.
The final segment of the meeting was reserved for the sharing
of information on small arms-related issues, including
recent or upcoming
conferences, the publication of new reports, etc.
|
Chair:
H.E. Mr. Wegger Christian Strømmen,
Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Norway to the United Nations
Invited Speaker:
Mr. Nicholas Marsh,
International Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO)
Report back on the 22-23 March Oslo conference on “Integrating
a Development Component into the UN Program of Action Process”
Participants:
Australia, Austria, Canada, Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, Chile,
Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Groupe de recherche et d'Information
sur la paix et la sécurité (GRIP), India, International
Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), International Peace Research
Institute Oslo (PRIO), Ireland, Israel, Kenya, Mexico, Netherlands,
Norway, Oxfam, Peru, Programme for Strategic and International
Security Studies (PSIS), Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO),
Russian Federation, Saferworld, Small Arms Survey, Sweden, Switzerland,
UK, UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF), UN Department for Disarmament
Affairs (UNDDA), UN Development Programme (UNDP), UN Institute
for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR), World Council of Churches
|
| 29 March 2006 |
27th
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of
the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms
The meeting,
which took place between the President-designate's March 27 and
March
30 consultations in New York, was devoted
to a discussion
of part 2 of his non-paper on "Concrete Measures to Strengthen
Implementation at National, Regional and Global Levels" of
the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms. This non-paper was circulated
the day before to Permanent Missions in New York.
|
Chair:
H.E. Mr. Wegger Christian Strømmen,
Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Norway to the United Nations
Participants:
Australia, Austria, Bulgaria, Canada, Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue,
Chile, China, Egypt, European Commission, Finland, France, Franciscans
International, Germany, India, International Committee of the
Red Cross (ICRC), Israel, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, Netherlands,
New Zealand, Norway, Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human
Rights (OHCHR), Oxfam / Control Arms, Peru, Quaker United Nations
Office (QUNO), Saferworld, Small Arms Survey, South Africa, Sweden,
Switzerland, UK, UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA),
UN Development Programme (UNDP), UN Institute for Disarmament
Research (UNIDIR), USA, World Council of Churches
|
| 20 March 2006 |
26th
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the
UN Programme of Action on Small Arms
The meeting was devoted to an exchange of views with the President-designate
of the first PoA Review Conference, Ambassador Prasad Kariyawasam
of Sri Lanka. The participation of Ambassador Kariyawasam provided
a valuable opportunity to Geneva Process participants to provide
input and suggestions to the President-designate on the Review
Conference and its outcome.
|
Chair:
H.E. Mr. Wegger Christian Strømmen,
Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Norway to the United Nations
Invited Speakers:
Mr. Peter Weiderud,
Director, Commission of the Churches on International Affairs,
World Council of Churches
H.E. Mr. Prasad Kariyawasam,
Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the United
Nations, New York; President-designate of the first Review Conference
of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms and Light Weapons
Participants:
Australia, Austria, Biting the Bullet (Saferworld and University
of Bradford), Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Centre for Humanitarian
Dialogue, Chile, China, Colombia, Egypt, European Commission,
Finland, France, Franciscans International, Germany, Groupe de
recherche et d'Information sur la paix et la sécurité (GRIP),
India, International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA), International
Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Israel, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands,
New Zealand, Norway, Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human
Rights (OHCHR), Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees
(UNHCR), Oxfam / Control Arms, Peru, Programme for Strategic
and International Security Studies (PSIS), Quaker United Nations
Office (QUNO), Russian Federation, Small Arms Survey, Sri Lanka,
South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, UN Department for Disarmament
Affairs (UNDDA), UN Development Programme (UNDP), UN Institute
for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR), USA, World Council of Churches
|
| 1 March 2006 |
25th Meeting of the Geneva Process to
Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms
The starting-point of our meeting was a reflection on the Review
Conference Preparatory Committee that took place in New York in
January. In particular, it was useful to focus on lessons that
can be learned from the PrepCom that might be useful in helping
governments prepare for the Review Conference.
The core of our meeting focused on preparations for the Review
Conference itself. The focal-point was the non-paper by the Chair-designate
of the Review Conference, Ambassador Prasad Kariyawasam of Sri
Lanka. This non-paper set out some options regarding the substance
of a draft final document of the Review Conference, as well as
its indicative timetable and proceedings. |
Chair:
H.E. Mr. Wegger Christian Strømmen, Ambassador, Permanent
Representative of Norway to the United Nations
Participants:
Amnesty International, Arias Foundation for Peace and Human Progress,
Australia, Austria, Biting the Bullet (Saferworld and University
of Bradford), Belgium, Canada, Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue,
Chile, Egypt, European Commission, Finland, France, Franciscans
International, Germany, Groupe de recherche et d'Information
sur la paix et la sécurité (GRIP), India, International
Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA), International Alert, International
Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Ireland, Israel, Japan, Kenya,
Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Oxfam, Quaker United
Nations Office (QUNO), Russian Federation, Saferworld, Small
Arms Survey, South Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control
of Small Arms and Light Weapons (SEESAC), Sweden, Switzerland,
UK, UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA), UN Development
Programme (UNDP), UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR),
USA, World Council of Churches, World Health Organisation (WHO)
|
| 15 December 2005 |
24th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of
the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms
In
response to an invitation by the Geneva Forum, the Chair-designate
of the Preparatory Committee for the first Review
Conference of
the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms – H.E.
Dr. Sylvester E. Rowe, Ambassador of Sierra Leone to the UN in New York – visited
Geneva on December 14-16. During his visit, he conducted open-ended
and bilateral consultations with UN Member States and participated
in numerous other meetings facilitated by the Geneva Forum.
A principal
reason for his visit was to participate in the 24th meeting of
the Geneva Process on small arms. The bulk of this meeting was
dedicated to an exchange of views with Ambassador Rowe on substantive
and procedural issues surrounding the Preparatory Committee as
well as the Review Conference itself.
In addition, there was
a brief presentation of the preliminary results of an analysis
of
all PoA national implementation reports submitted by States
between 2002 and 2005. This analysis, in the process of being finalised
by UNIDIR, UNDDA, UNDP and the Small Arms Survey, drew lessons
from States’ reporting on their implementation of the PoA
that have relevance for the Review Conference and its preparatory
process. At the close of the meeting, Ambassador François
Rivasseau of France reported on the progress of the Geneva Process
sub-group on communications, established at our last meeting to
develop strategies for raising public awareness of the humanitarian
impact of small arms proliferation and misuse.
|
Chair:
H.E. Mr. Wegger Christian Strømmen, Ambassador, Permanent
Representative of Norway to the United Nations Invited Speakers:
H.E. Dr. Sylvester E. Rowe, Ambassador, Deputy Permanent Representative
of Sierra Leone to the United Nations (New York); Chair-designate
of the Small Arms Review Conference Preparatory Committee
Participants:
Australia - Austria - Belgium - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian
Dialogue - Colombia - Egypt - European Commission - Finland -
France - Germany - GRIP - International Action Network on Small
Arms (IANSA) - International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)
- Ireland - Israel - Japan - Kenya - Mexico - Morocco - Netherlands
- New Zealand - Norway - Oxfam - Peru - Quaker United Nations
Office (QUNO) Russian Federation - Saferworld - Sierra Leone
- Small Arms Survey - Sweden - Switzerland - UK - UN Development
Programme (UNDP) - UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR)
- USA - World Health Organisation (WHO)
|
| 15 November 2005 |
23rd Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of
the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms
This meeting began with the usual exchange of information
on global, regional and national initiatives related to the implementation
of the UN Programme of Action. In particular, there were reports
on a seminar
organised by the Geneva Forum in Glen Cove, New York,
on 30 September – 2 October; on the meeting of the Parliamentary
Forum on Small Arms and Light Weapons held
in Mexico City on 19-21 October; and on the ASEAN Regional Forum
small arms seminar held
in Phnom Penh on 2-4 November. The small arms-related draft resolutions
adopted by the UN General Assembly’s First Committee were
also presented.
The bulk of the meeting was devoted to discussing the preparatory
process for the 2006 small arms Review Conference in light of
the discussions that took place in First Committee. Ambassador
Pasi
Patokallio (Finland’s Ambassador to Canada) provided his
perspective on the preparatory process, drawing in particular
on his experience as Chair of the second Biennial Meeting of
States
in July 2005. The UN Department for Disarmament Affairs also
briefed participants on open-ended consultations on the 2006
Review Conference
held in New York on October 19. These presentations were followed
by an open discussion on what needs to be achieved at the January
Preparatory Committee and what form and approach it should take.
The final segment of the meeting returned to the question of awareness-raising
around the small arms Programme of Action with a view to putting
into motion some of the plans discussed in at previous meetings.
|
Chair:
H.E. Mr. Luis Alfonso de Alba, Ambassador, Permanent Representative
of Mexico to the United Nations.
Invited Speakers:
H.E. Mr. Pasi Patokallio, Ambassador of Finland to Canada; Chair
of the second Biennial Meeting of States to consider implementation
of the UN Programme of Action on small arms
Participants:
Australia - Austria - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue
- European Commission - Finland - France - Germany - GRIP - International
Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) - International Committee
of the Red Cross (ICRC) - India - Ireland - Japan - Kenya - Mexico
- National Commission Against Proliferation of Illicit Small
Arms and Light Weapons (Sri Lanka) - Netherlands - Norway - Office
of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) - Oxfam - Parliamentary
Forum on Small Arms and Light Weapons - Peru - Quaker United
Nations Office (QUNO) Russian Federation - Saferworld - Small
Arms Survey - Sweden - UK - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs
(UNDDA) - UN Development Programme (UNDP) - UN Institute for
Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) - USA - World Health Organisation
(WHO)
|
| 15 September 2005 |
22nd Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of
the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms
The 22nd meeting of the Geneva Process on Small Arms dealt with
the following issues:
- Reflections
on BMS2: The first part of the meeting
reflected on the content and outcome of the second
Biennial Meeting of States
(BMS2), held at UN Headquarters in New York on 11-15 July 2005.
The meeting reviewed the conclusions of the Biting
the Bullet/IANSA “Red
Book” on the state of PoA implementation. A representative
of the UNDP/UNIDIR/UNDDA/Small Arms Survey PoA reporting assistance
initiative provided a preliminary analysis of national reporting
at BMS2, putting particular emphasis on what implications the contents
of the 2005 national reports might have for preparations for the
2006 review conference.
- Ambitions
for the 2006 review conference: Geneva
Process participants outlined their principal ambitions for the
2006 review
conference,
identifying areas of convergence and divergence in States’ visions
of what the review conference is mandated to do and what it can
achieve.
- Preparations
for First Committee: The UN
General Assembly’s
First Committee was scheduled to meet from October 3 to November
4. The meeting discussed the small arms-related draft resolutions
and decisions that were currently being prepared by States as well
as the question of how best to adopt – and activate – the
tracing instrument. This year’s First Committee will also
include a thematic discussion on small arms and light weapons,
scheduled for one session during the second half of the second
week. Participants also discussed how to make the most of the debate
that would take place during First Committee.
- Some
elements of future work: This forward-looking
segment of the meeting included a presentation on the work of
the Parliamentary
Forum on Small Arms and Light Weapons, a discussion on raising
global public awareness of the impact of small arms proliferation
and misuse, and some ideas about how the Geneva Process should
organise its work over the coming year.
|
Chair:
H.E. Mr. Luis Alfonso de Alba, Ambassador, Permanent Representative
of Mexico to the United Nations.
Invited Speakers:
Ms. Maria J. Lundberg, Parliamentary Forum on Small Arms and
Light Weapons.
Participants:
Austria - Belgium - Biting the Bullet - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian
Dialogue - European Commission - Finland - France - Germany
- GRIP - India - International Action Network on Small Arms
(IANSA) - International Alert - International Committee of
the Red Cross (ICRC) - Israel - Japan - Netherlands - Norway
- Mexico - Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees
(UNHCR) - Parliamentary Forum on Small Arms and Light Weapons
- Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO) - Russian Federation
- Small Arms Survey - South Africa - Sweden - Switzerland -
UK - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA) - UN Development
Programme - UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR)
- USA - World Council of Churches -
|
| 28 June 2005 |
21st Meeting of the
Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme
of Action on Small Arms
The 21st meeting
of the Geneva Process on small arms focused on the following
issues:
- Exchange
of information: The meeting began with an exchange of information
on global, regional and national initiatives related
to the implementation of the UN Programme of Action. Participants
provided brief reports of relevant activities, recent or planned,
in their countries and regions.
- The
impact of Gun violence on humanitarian and Development Personnel: Robert
Muggah
(Small Arms Survey) provided a brief overview of
the findings and recommendations of a recent study undertaken by
the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue and the Small Arms Survey
entitled, “No
Relief: Surveying the effects of gun violence on humanitarian
and development personnel.” The study was
based on a survey of over 2,000 development professionals working
for 17 UN agencies and international NGOs in 96 countries. As such,
it is the largest aid worker study ever undertaken.
- On the
Eve of BMS2…: Just two weeks before the beginning
of the second
Biennial Meeting of States (BMS2), participants
shared views on issues they planed to raise during the thematic
debate,
bearing
in mind
the
questions
proposed
by the Chair-designate in his letter to UN Member States of
May 20. They discussed how to make the most use of NGO participation
and government-civil society interaction at BMS2. There was
also
a discussion on raising public awareness of the problems posed
by the proliferation and misuse of small arms – and on
ways of advancing this important work at BMS2 and in the run-up
to the
Review Conference. Finally, participants set out their respective
visions of a successful outcome to BMS2.
|
Chair:
Dr. David Atwood, Director, Quaker United Nations Office
Participants:
Australia - Austria - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue
- European Commission - Finland - France - Germany - GRIP -
India - International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA)
- International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - Ireland
- Japan - Kenya - Mexico - Office of the UN High Commissioner
for Refugees (UNHCR) - Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO)
- Russian Federation - Small Arms Survey - Sweden - Switzerland
- UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA) - UN Institute
for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) - USA - World Council of
Churches -
|
| 14 April 2005 |
20th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of
the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms
The 20th meeting of the Geneva Process on small arms focused on
the following issues:
- Exchange
of information: The meeting began with
the usual exchange of information on global, regional and national
initiatives related
to the implementation of the UN Programme of Action. Information
shared at the meeting was added to the online, searchable database
hosted on the website of the Small Arms Survey.
- Exchange
of views with Ambassador Pasi Patokallio on a list of questions
for BMS2: In his letter to UN Member States
of 1 March
2005, the Chair-designate of the 2nd Biennial Meeting of States
(BMS2), Ambassador Pasi Patokallio of Finland, announced his intention
to prepare a list of questions to help participants prepare for
the thematic debate. This exchange of views with Amb. Patokallio,
which revolved around a list of suggested questions prepared by
a group of Geneva Process participants, focused on how such a list
of questions might be formulated to make best use of the thematic
segment of BMS2.
- Focus
on small arms ammunition: The PoA is widely
understood to encompass not only small arms and light weapons,
but also their
ammunition. However, progress in implementing the PoA in relation
to ammunition is quite uneven, partly because ammunition is
often considered to be a residual category under small arms
agreements
and partly because the control of ammunition presents its own
set of problems. Dr. Owen Greene of Bradford University,
UK, and Mr.
Adrian Wilkinson of the South Eastern Europe Clearinghouse
for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons (SEESAC)
made introductory
presentations on this issue. A recent Biting
the Bullet report on ammunition stocks was made available to participants.
- “In Larger Freedom;” the Secretary-General’s
report and implications for small arms work in the United Nations:
Kofi Annan’s report, “In larger freedom: towards development,
security and human rights for all,” sets out an ambitious
set of proposals and reforms that have potentially far-reaching
implications for how the United Nations carries out its work. But
what, if anything, does it imply for multilateral efforts to control
the illicit small arms trade? Daniël Prins of the Netherlands
Disarmament Mission took a close look at the report through a small
arms lens and reported on what he found.
|
Chair:
Mr. Peter Herby, Head, Mines/Arms Unit, International Committee of
the Red Cross (ICRC)
Invited Speakers:
H.E. Mr. Pasi Patokallio, Ambassador of Finland to Canada and
Chair-designate of the second Biennial Meeting of States to
consider implementation of the UN Programme of Action on small
arms
Dr. Owen Greene, Department of Peace Studies, University of
Bradford, UK.
Mr. Adrian Wilkinson, Team Leader, South Eastern Europe Clearinghouse
for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons (SEESAC), Serbia
and Montenegro.
Mr. Daniël Prins, Counsellor, Delegation
of the Kingdom of the Netherlands to the Conference on Disarmament.
Participants:
Australia - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China -
Finland - France - Germany - Israel - International Alert -
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - Italy - Japan
- Luxembourg - Mexico - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway
- Peru - Programme for Strategic and International Security
Studies (PSIS) - Quaker UN Office (QUNO) - Russian Federation
- Ryerson University (Canada) - Saferworld - Small Arms Survey
- South Africa - South Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the
Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons (SEESAC) - Sweden -
Switzerland - Thailand - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs
(UNDDA) - UN Development Programme (UNDP) - UN High Commission
for Refugees (UNHCR) - UN Institute for Disarmament Research
(UNIDIR) - University of Bradford (UK) - USA - World Council
of Churches - World Health Organisation (WHO) -
|
| 10 February 2005 |
19th
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the
UN Programme of Action on Small Arms
This meeting
was devoted to an exchange of views between Geneva Process participants
and
H.E.
Mr. Pasi Patokallio – Ambassador
of Finland to Canada and Chair-designate of the second Biennial Meeting
of States to consider implementation of the UN Programme of Action
on small arms – on the following questions:
- Written National
Reports: What should be the deadline for submitting national reports?
How can they best be used in preparing the meeting?
- Meeting Structure:
How can BMS2 best be structured to consider (1) national implementation,
(2) inputs from international, regional
and nongovernmental organisations, and (3) thematic debate? How
should time be divided up?
- Thematic Debate:
What is the process for determining the structure and content of
the thematic debate? Does the Chair-designate
plan
to issue a set of guiding questions? Can some prominent themes
already be identified?
- NGO Participation:
Should the entire meeting, including the thematic debate, to open
to NGO participants? Could governments be formally
encouraged to include NGO representatives and parliamentarians
on their delegations?
- Chair’s
report: What format does the Chair-designate have in mind for his
final report of the meeting?
- BMS2 as a step
on the road from 2001 to 2006: What is the Chair-designate’s
vision of the role to be played by BMS2 in helping move the
international community from the 2001 Conference to the 2006
Conference.
- Communication
with and support of the Chair-designate: How
does the Chair-designate plan to communicate and interact
with states,
international organisations and NGOs in the run-up to the
meeting? How can Geneva Process participants best support the
work of
the Chair-designate?
|
Chair:
David Atwood, Director, Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO)
Invited Speaker:
H.E. Mr. Pasi Patokallio, Ambassador of Finland to Canada and
Chair-designate of the second Biennial Meeting of States to
consider implementation of the UN Programme of Action on small
arms
Participants:
- Amnesty International - Australia - Austria - Belgium - Canada
- Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China - European Commission
- Finland - France - Germany - India - International Action
Network on Small Arms (IANSA) - International Alert - International
Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - Ireland - Israel - Japan
- Kenya - Mexico - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway - Peru
- Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies
(PSIS) - Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO) - Russian Federation
- Small Arms Survey - South Africa - Switzerland - UK - UN
Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA) - UN Development
Programme (UNDP) - UN High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR)
- UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) - USA - World
Council of Churches -
|
| 19 January 2005 |
18th
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the
UN Programme of Action on Small Arms
The meeitng began,
as usual, with a general round of information-sharing on global activities
related to the implementation of the UN Programme of Action on
small arms. This
information is added to the ever-growing database on
the Small Arms Survey
website that tracks global implementation
of the UN Programme of Action. The remainder the the meeting focuses
on two issues:
Draft
Tracing Instrument: The Chair of the Open-Ended Working Group on tracing small arms,
Ambassador Anton Thalmann of Switzerland, had recently released
a first draft on an “International Instrument for the Timely
and Reliable Identification and Tracing of Illicit Small Arms
and Light
Weapons." Mr. Ilhan Berkol of the Groupe de recherche
et d'Information sur la paix et la sécurité (GRIP)
in Belgium made an introductory presentation on the draft text,
which was followed by a discussion.
The Second
Biennial Meeting of States: Participants
discussed the following questions concerning the structure and
themes of the second Biennial Meeting of States (BMS2) to review
implementation of the UN Programme of Action, scheduled to take place
on 11-15 July 2005:
- Structure:
Concrete suggestions regarding how the agenda of
BMS2 could
best be structured to consider national
implementation;
inputs from nongovernmental, international and regional
organisations; and thematic debate. The lessons to be drawn
from BMS1 regarding
how best to structure BMS2?
- Themes:
Suggestions regarding the specific issues to be discussed during
the thematic debate
at BMS2 For example; should themes be identified in
advance of the
meeting or allowed to emerge during the meeting itself;
would it be better to select a small number of themes or have
a
wider-ranging
debate on many issues; would it be helpful to structure
the thematic debate through the use of questionnaires or other
devices, etc.?
|
Chair:
Mr. Peter Herby, Head, Mines/Arms Unit, International Committee of
the Red Cross (ICRC)
Invited
Speaker:
Mr. Ilhan Berkol, Senior Researcher,
Groupe de recherche et d'Information sur la paix et la sécurité (GRIP),
Belgium
Presentation - 28KB
Participants:
Amnesty International - Australia - Austria - Belgium - Canada
- Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China - Finland - France
- Germany - India -International Action Network on Small Arms
(IANSA) - International Alert - International Committee of
the Red
Cross
(ICRC) - Israel - Japan - Kenya - Landmine Action UK - Mexico
- Netherlands - North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) -
Norway
- Oxfam - Programme for Strategic and International Security
Studies (PSIS) - Project Ploughshares - Quaker United Nations
Office (QUNO) - Russian Federation - SaferAfrica - Saferworld
- Small Arms Survey - Sweden - Switzerland
- Thailand
- UK - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA) - UN Development
Programme (UNDP) - UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR)
- UN Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human
Rights - University of Bradford - USA
|
| 17 November 2004 |
17th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of
the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms
This meeting focused on three main issues:
Recent activities around the world connected with implementing
the UN Programme of Action on small arms: An overview was presented
of information collected since the previous Geneva Process meeting
on activities in various countries and regions related to the
implementation of the UN Programme of Action. Further information
was also provided by representatives of Sweden, Thailand, QUNO
and Saferworld. The information shared was entered into the Geneva
Process Programme
of Action Implementation database, hosted by
the Small Arms Survey.
Small arms-related work at the UN General Assembly First
Committee: Participants discussed the various small
arms-related draft resolutions
and decisions to emerge from the 2004 session of the
UN General Assembly First
Committee (4 October – 5
November) as well as their implications for preparations
for the 2005
Biennial
Meeting of States and the 2006 Review Conference. The
discussion also included feedback on the informal consultations
of
the Open-Ended
Working Group on tracing small arms that took
place on the margins
of the First Committee.
Raising global public awareness of the humanitarian consequences
of the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons:
Simon Gray of Oxfam Great Britain’s Campaigns Department
gave a presentation on the importance of raising global
public awareness
of the humanitarian
consequences of the proliferation and misuse of small
arms and light weapons and on ways and means of doing
so. Participants
discussed the role that governments and organisations
participating in the Geneva Process might play in making
the public more
aware
of small arms-related problems.
|
Chair:
Mr. Peter Herby, Head, Mines/Arms Unit, International Committee of
the Red Cross (ICRC)
Invited Speaker:
Mr. Simon Gray, Campaigns Department, Oxfam Great Britain.
Presentation - 271KB
Participants:
Austria - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - Finland -
France - Germany - India - International Alert - International
Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - Japan - Mexico - Office of
the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) - Oxfam Great Britain
- Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies (PSIS)
- Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO) - Russian Federation - Saferworld
- Small Arms Survey - Sweden - Switzerland - Thailand - UK - UN
Development Programme (UNDP) - UN Institute for Disarmament Research
(UNIDIR) - USA - World Council of Churches -
|
| 8
September 2004 |
16th
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN
Programme of Action on Small Arms
This meeting
began with a general round of information-sharing on global activities
related to the implementation of the UN Programme of Action. This
information is added to the ever-growing database
on the Small Arms Survey website that tracks global implementation
of the UN Programme of Action.
The principal
procedural issues discussed at this meeting were:
- Visions
for the 2006 Review Conference, i.e., what do Geneva Process
participants
hope will be the main outcomes of the 2006 review conference
and what, therefore, should be the key elements of the review
conference
discussion?
- Preparations
for the 2005 Biennial Meeting of States, i.e., what should the
agenda of the 2005 BMS look like?
The substantive
segment of the meeting focused on Man-portable Air Defence Systems
(MANPADS) and on national, regional and international efforts to
prevent their illicit proliferation and misuse. A presentation
by James Bevan of the Small Arms Survey formed the core of this
discussion.
The meeting
also examined the progress of draft resolutions being prepared for
the 59th session of the UNGA First Committee and included a briefing
by the Geneva Process Chair on a planned press/media event to highlight
the work that the Geneva Process is doing to help implement the
UN Programme of Atction on small arms.
|
Chair:
Ambassador François Rivasseau, Premanent
Representative of France to the Conference on Disarmament
Invited
Speaker:
Mr.
James Bevan, Researcher, Small Arms Survey
Presentation -
150KB
Participants:
Amnesty International - Australia - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian
Dialogue - China - Colombia - Finland - France - Germany - International
Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) - International Committee of
the Red Cross (ICRC) - India - Institute for Security Studies, South
Africa - Japan - Mexico - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway - Office
of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) - Oxfam GB - Oxfam
International - Peru - Programme for Strategic and International
Security Studies, IUHEI - Quaker United Nations Office - Russian
Federation - SaferAfrica - Saferworld - Small Arms Survey - South
Africa - Sweden - Switzerland - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs
(UNDDA) - UN Development Programme (UNDP) - UN Institute for Disarmament
Research (UNIDIR) - World Council of Churches -
|
| 1
July 2004 |
15th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of
the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms
This meeting
of the Geneva Process on small arms began with an exchange of information
on global implementation of the UN Programme of Action on small
arms and light weapons. The remainder of the meeting dealt with
three main issues; (1) the Open-Ended Working Group on Tracing Small
Arms, (2) the broad-based consultations on small arms brokering,
and (3) preparations for the 2005 Biennial Meeting of States (BMS)
and the 2006 meeting to review implementation of the Programme of
Action.
Brian
Wood of Amnesty International reported back on the broad-based
consultations
on small arms brokering that took place in New York on 11 June,
organised by the UN Department for Disarmament Affairs. The discussion
on this issue centred on assessing the outcome of the Geneva
and
New York consultations to date and on next steps that might be
taken on this issue, including preparations for this year’s meting
of the UN General Assembly’s (UNGA) First Committee.
Thomas Greminger
of the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs reported to the
group on the outcome of the first substantive session of the Open
Ended Working Group on Tracing Small Arms, which took place in New
York on 14-25 June. Participants went on to discuss what needed
to be done in advance of the second substantive session, scheduled
to take place early in 2005.
Participants
also exchanged views on preparations for the second Biennial Meeting
of States (BMS) in 2005, in particular what needs to be done before,
during and after the UNGA First Committee to ensure that the meeting
is a success. Participants also discussed what would have to be
done now and at the second BMS to lay the proper groundwork for
the 2006 review meeting.
|
Chair:
Ambassador François Rivasseau, Premanent
Representative of France to the Conference on Disarmament
Invited
Speakers:
Mr.
Brian Wood, Amnesty International
Mr.
Thomas Greminger, Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs
Participants:
Amnesty International - Australia - Canada - Centre for
Humanitarian Dialogue - China - Colombia - Egypt - France - Germany
- International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) - International
Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - India - International Alert
- Ireland - Japan - Mexico - New Zealand - Norway - Peru - Quaker
UN Office (QUNO) - Sofia University, Tokyo - Sweden - Switzerland
- UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA) - UN Development
Programme (UNDP) - Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees
(UNHCR) - UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) - United
States of America - World Council of Churches -
|
| 7
June 2004 |
14th
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN
Programme of Action on Small Arms
The
14th meeting of the Geneva Process on small arms focused on the
issue of small
arms demand. Participants explored what is actually meant when
one speaks of “demand” for small arms and light weapons,
how the issue of demand relates to the UN Programme of Action,
and
what the latest research on small arms demand tells us.
The discussion
was preceded by three introductory presentations: David Atwood,
Director of the Quaker United Nations Office, highlighted those
elements of the UN Programme of Action on small arms that relate
to addressing the demand for small arms and light weapons. Keith
Krause and Robert Muggah, Director and Senior Researcher, respectively,
at the Small Arms Survey, focused on the research agenda surrounding
the question of small arms demand and presented preliminary results
from research recently carried out in the Solomon Islands and Papua
New Guinea.
Participants
also continued the general exchange of views, initiated at the previous
Geneva Process meeting, on the 2nd Biennial Meeting of States. They
outlined their expectations for this meeting and provided some suggestions
as to how the Geneva Process might foster good preparation for it.
During
the segment set aside for sharing information on global implementation
of the
UN Programme of Action, Ambassador Christian Faessler of Switzerland
briefed participants on the Open-Ended Working Group on Tracing
Small Arms and the non-paper produced by the Group’s Chairman;
Philip Owade of Kenya introduced the newly signed Nairobi Protocol
on Small Arms and Light Weapons; Valère Mantels of UNDDA
briefed participants on the progress of the broad-based consultations
on small arms brokering; and Valerie Yankey provided her usual
overview
of recent activities around the world aimed at implementing the
UN Programme of Action on small arms.
|
Chair:
Ambassador François Rivasseau, Premanent
Representative of France to the Conference on Disarmament
Speakers:
Dr.
David Atwood, Director, Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva
Prof.
Keith Krause, Programme Director, Small Arms Survey
Mr.
Robert Muggah, Senior Researcher, Small Arms Survey
Participants:
Australia
- Austria - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China -
France - Germany - International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA)
- International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - India - International
Alert - Japan - Kenya - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway - Programme
for Strategic and International Security Studies (PSIS) - Quaker
United Nations Office (QUNO) - Russian Federation - Small Arms Survey
- South Africa - Sri Lanka - Switzerland - UN Department for Disarmament
Affairs (UNDDA) - UN Development Programme (UNDP) - UN Institute
for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) - United Kingdom - United States
of America -
|
| 6
April 2004 |
13th
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN
Programme of Action on Small Arms
The
13th meeting of the Geneva Process on small arms focused on the “Vienna
Firearms Protocol” or, to give it its full title, The Protocol
against the Illicit Manufacturing and Trafficking in Firearms,
Their
Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the United Nations
Convention against Transnational Organized Crime.
This
Protocol was opened for signature in the same month – July 2001 –
that the UN Conference agreed on its Programme of Action (PoA) on
the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons. In contrast to
the UN PoA, the Vienna Firearms Protocol is a legally binding global
instrument that covers many of the pressing issues being discussed
today within the framework of the UN PoA and elsewhere – e.g.,
marking and tracing, export controls, stockpile management, brokering,
collection and destruction, criminalisation, and international
cooperation
and assistance. An important difference between the Firearms Protocol
and the UN PoA, however, is that the former only addresses commercial
transactions in firearms, and exempts state-to-state transactions
and transfers.
The Vienna Firearms
Protocol has not yet entered into force and, in fact, is making
quite slow progress towards doing so. To date, while 51 countries
and the European Union have signed the Firearms Protocol, only 14
have ratified it (40 ratifications are required for the Protocol
to enter into force).
Mr. Eduardo
Vetere, Director of the Division for Treaty Affairs at the UN Office
for Drugs and Crime in Vienna, gave a presentation on
the Protocol, covering its genesis and raison d’etre, its
adoption by the General Assembly and opening for signature in 2001,
and a detailed analysis of its provisions.
Mr. Michael
Hallowes, Detective Chief Inspector with the Metropolitan Police
Service at New Scotland Yard in London, made a presentation
giving a policing perspective on the Vienna Firearms Protocol, with
particular emphasis on its provisions on criminalisation, record-keeping
and marking.
A portion of
the meeting was also devoted to a preliminary discussion of the
2nd Biennial Meeting of States (BMS) to consider implementation
of the UN PoA, scheduled to take place in 2005. Participants briefly
outlined their expectations for this meeting as well as their ideas
on how the Geneva Process might foster good preparation for it.
|
Chair:
Mr. Prosper Bani, United Nations Development Programme
Invited
Speakers:
Mr.
Eduardo Vetere, Director, Division for Treaty Affairs,
United Nations Office for Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Vienna.
Presentation
-
78KB
Mr.
Michael Hallowes, Detective Chief Inspector, Metropolitan
Police Service, New Scotland Yard, London.
Presentation
-
472KB
Participants:
Australia - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue -
China - France - International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA)
- International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - India - Kenya
- New Scotland Yard - Norway - Programme for Strategic and International
Security Studies (PSIS) - Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO) -
Russian Federation - Small Arms Survey - South Africa - Sweden -
UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA) - UN Development Programme
(UNDP) - Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
- UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) - UN Office on
Drugs and Crime - UK - USA -
|
| 20
February 2004 |
12th
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN
Programme of Action on Small Arms
The
12th meeting of the Geneva Process on small arms had as its main
focus a detailed
exposition of the draft “Framework Convention on International
Arms Transfers” (more commonly known as the “Arms Trade
Treaty”), a nongovernmental initiative that is being promoted
by the recently launched “Control Arms” campaign headed
by Oxfam, Amnesty International and the International Action Network
on Small Arms (IANSA).
Debbie Hillier
of Oxfam GB gave a detailed presentation on
the background, content and future development of the Arms Trade
Treaty, which was followed by a detailed discussion. In addition,
the UN Development Programme (UNDP) provided an update on their
project on “Capacity Building for Reporting to the UN Programme
of Action on Small Arms” and the Geneva Forum reported back
on a two-day meeting it had held on “The Role of Regional
Organisations in Stemming the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light
Weapons.”
|
Chair:
Mr. Prosper Bani, United Nations Development Programme
Invited
Speakers:
Ms.
Debbie Hillier, Policy Advisor, Oxfam Great Britain
Presentation
-
781KB
Participants
Australia - Austria - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian
Dialogue - China - France - India - International Action Network
on Small Arms (IANSA) - International Committee of the Red Cross
(ICRC) - Japan - Kenya - Netherlands - Norway - Office of the UN
High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCHR) - Office of the UN High
Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) - Oxfam GB - Programme for Strategic
and International Security Studies (PSIS) - Quaker UN Office (QUNO)
- Russian Federation - Saferworld - Small Arms Survey - Sweden -
Switzerland - UK - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs - UN Development
Programme - UN Institute for Disarmament Research - USA -World Council
of Churches -
|
| 10
December 2003 |
11th
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN
Programme of Action on Small Arms
The
11th meeting of the Geneva Process to promote implementation
of the UN Programme
of Action on small arms and light weapons had as its focus the
issue of small arms brokering. Introductory presentations on
this issue
were given by Mr. Brian Wood of Amnesty International, who outlined
the nature and extent of the problem, Ambassadors Chris Sanders
(The Netherlands) and Sten Anders Berge (Norway), who gave an
introduction
to the Dutch/Norwegian initiative on small arms brokering and,
in particular, the initiative’s activities at the regional
level, and Ms. Silvia Cattaneo of the Small Arms Survey, who
presented
a review of national legislation regulating the activities of small
arms brokers.
The
meeting also included the usual exchange of information related
to the global
implementation of the UN Programme of Action, as well as the introduction
of the OSCE handbook of best practices on small arms and light
weapons
and volume 2 of the publication “The Geneva Forum: Seminars
on Small Arms.”
|
Chair:
Mr. Prosper Bani, United Nations Development Programme
Invited
Speakers:
Mr.
Brian Wood, Amnesty International
Ambassador
Chris Sanders, Permanent Representative of the Netherlands
to the Conference on Disarmament
Ambassador
Sten Anders Berge, Ambassador-at-large for Small Arms,
Norway
Ms.
Silvia Cattaneo, Researcher, Small Arms Survey
Patricipants:
Amnesty
International - Arias Foundation - Australia - Austria - Bulgaria
- Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China - Colombia -
France - India - Institute for Security Studies (South Africa) -
International Action Network on Small Arms - International Alert
- International Committee of the Red Cross - Ireland - Japan - Monterrey
Institute of International Studies - Netherlands - Norway - Peru
- Project Ploughshares - Saferworld - Small Arms Survey - South
Africa - Sweden - Switzerland - Thailand - United Kingdom - UN Department
for Disarmament Affairs - UN Development Programme - United States
of America - Viva Rio - World Council of Churches - Geneva Forum
Partner Organisations -
|
| 10
September 2003 |
10th
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN
Programme of Action on Small Arms
The 10th meeting
of the Geneva Process took stock of the First Biennial Meeting of
States (BMS) to review implementation of the UN Programme of Action
on small arms and discussed what needed to happen in the area of
small arms controls before the Second BMS in 2005 and the first
Review Conference in 2006.
Opening
presentations on these issues were made by Dr. Joao Honwana (Director
of the Conventional
Arms Branch of the UN Department for Disarmament Affairs), Ms.
Ann Pollack (Deputy Permanent Representative of Canada to the
Conference
on Disarmament) and Mr. Henry Smith (Head of Arms and Security
at Saferworld/Biting the Bullet). Participants also shared new
information
related to the worldwide implementation of the UN Programme of
action, including information on a new training handbook from
Saferworld/Oxfam/International
Alert entitled “Action Against Small Arms, on the updated
Programme of Action Implementation Database and on donor support
for small arms programmes. |
Chair:
Dr. David Atwood, Director, Quaker United Nations
Office, Geneva (standing in for Ambassador Camillo Reyes Rodriguez
of Colombia)
Invited
Speakers:
Dr.
Joao Honwana,
Director, Conventional Arms Branch, UN Department for Disarmament
Affairs
Ms.
Ann Pollack, Deputy Permanent Representative of Canada
to the Conference on Disarmament
Mr.
Henry Smith, Head of Arms and Security, Saferworld
Participants:
Australia
- Biting the Bullet - Bulgaria - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian
Dialogue - China - Colombia - France - International Action Network
on Small Arms (IANSA) - India - Ireland - Japan - Kenya - New Zealand
- Russian Federation - Small Arms Survey - South Africa - UN Department
for Disarmament Affairs - UN Development Programme - USA, World
Health Organisation - Geneva Forum Partner Organisations -
|
| 24
June 2003
|
9th
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN
Programme of Action on Small Arms
The 9th meeting
of the Geneva Process on small arms - the last before the first
UN Biennial Meeting to consider implementation of the Programme
of Action (7-11 July 2003, New York) - considered how to make the
most of the thematic discussion scheduled to take place at the first
UN Biennial meeting. Participants also cast a critical eye on the
work of the Geneva Process since its first meeting on 17 May 2002,
decided to continue the Geneva Process on small arms following the
Biennial Meeting and offered some ideas regarding its future shape
and work. |
Chair:
Ambassador Camillo Reyes Rodriguez, Permanent Representative
of Colombia to the United Nations
Participants:
Australia
- Bulgaria - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China -
Colombia - International Committee of the Red Cross - Ireland -
Japan - Mali - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway - Small Arms Survey
- Switzerland - Thailand - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs
- UN Development Programme - USA - World Council of Churches - World
Health Organisation - Geneva Forum Partner Organisations -
|
| 22
May 2003
|
8th
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN
Programme of Action on Small Arms
The 8th meeting
of the Geneva Process on small arms considered the following issues:
- Regional
approaches to tackling the problem of small arms using the example
of West Africa. Mr. Conmany B. Wesseh, Steering Committee Chair
of the West African Action Network on Small Arms, made a presentation
detailing the challenges and opportunities involved in addressing
the problem of small arms in this region.
- Ambassador
Kuniko Inoguchi of Japan (Chair-designate of the first UN Biennial
Meeting to consider implementation of the UN Programme of Action)
provided an update on preparations for the Biennial Meeting and
on emerging issues for this meeting's thematic discussion.
- Mr. Iain
Hall of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees provided
a UN Agency perspective on the problems associated with the wide
availability and use of small arms in the context of humanitarian
operations in the field.
|
Chair:
Ambassador Camillo Reyes Rodriguez, Permanent Representative
of Colombia to the United Nations
Invited
Speakers:
Mr.
Conmany B. Wesseh, West African Action Network on Small
Arms
Ambassador
Kuniko Inoguchi, Permanent Representative of Japan to the
Conference on Disarmament
Mr.
Iain Hall, Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees
Participants:
Australia
- Biting the Bullet - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue
- China - Colombia - France - India - International Action Network
on Small Arms - International Committee of the Red Cross - Japan
- Mali - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway - Office of the UN High
Commissioner for Refugees - Peru - Small Arms Survey - Sweden Switzerland
- Thailand - UK - UN Development Programme - USA - West African
Action Network on Small Arms - World Council of Churches - World
Health Organisation -
|
| 2
April 2003
|
7th
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN
Programme of Action on Small Arms
The 7th meeting
of the Geneva Process on small arms involved a general exchange
of ideas, intentions and hopes for the first UN biennial meeting
to consider implementation of the Programme of Action. This exchange
included, in particular, the perspectives of governments, civil
society and International Organisations.
The previous
meeting of the Geneva Process underlined the importance of ensuring
high quality reporting to the first biennial meeting and discussed
ways and means of evaluating the progress and impact of implementing
the Programme of Action. This meeting followed up on that discussion
in a more general way by posing the question: what do governments,
civil society and international organisations hope to achieve at
the first UN biennial meeting? In other words, how are they approaching
the meeting in general, what are their intentions regarding their
participation in the meeting, and what do they hope the outcome
of the meeting will be?
|
Chair:
Dr. Peter Batchelor, Project Director, Small Arms
Survey
Participants:
Australia
- Austria - Belgium - Bulgaria - Canada - Colombia - India - International
Action Network on Small Arms - International Committee of the Red
Cross - Ireland - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway - Peru - Russian
Federation - Small Arms Survey - South Africa - Sweden - Switzerland
- UN Department for Disarmament Affairs - UN Development Programme
- USA - World Council of Churches - World Health Organisation -
|
| 11
February 2003
|
6th
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN
Programme of Action on Small Arms
The 6th meeting
of the Geneva Process on small arms addressed the following issues:
- Strengthening
the capacity of states - especially those most affected by small
arms - to report to the first UN Biennial Meeting to consider
implementation of the Programme of Action.
- Measuring
Success: Indicators of PoA implementation and its impact. What
indicators could countries use to measure the successful implementation
of the PoA at the national level? How would countries assess
the “impact” of successful implementation of the
PoA, and what indicators could be used for such an assessment?
|
Chair:
Dr. Peter Batchelor, Project Director, Small Arms
Survey
Participants:
Australia - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue -
China - Colombia - India - Ireland - Japan - Netherlands - New Zealand
- Norway - Peru - Small Arms Survey - Sweden - Switzerland - Thailand
- United Nations Development Programme - UK - USA - World Health
Organisation - World Council of Churches -
|
| 12
December 2002
|
5th
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN
Programme of Action on Small Arms
The
purpose of this 5th meeting of the Geneva Process on small arms
was to initiate
a detailed (and ongoing) discussion on the identification of priority
needs related to the implementation of the PoA and the means
by
which these needs can best be matched with available "resources"
- defined broadly as not only financial resources but also human,
institutional, knowledge-based, etc. The discussion opened with
brief presentations by Marcel Halma (The Netherlands) and Bennie
Lombard,Rob Wensley and Nick Sendall (South Africa), who took as
their starting-point the report of the “African Conference
on the Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms:
Needs and Partnerships."
|
Chair:
Dr. David Atwood, Director, Quaker United Nations
Office, Geneva (standing in for Peter Batchelor of the Small Arms
Survey)
Participants:
Australia
- Belgium - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China -
Colombia - India - International Action Network on Small Arms -
International Committee of the Red Cross - Ireland - Japan - Netherlands
- Norway - Peru - Russian Federation - Small Arms Survey - South
Africa - Sweden - Switzerland - Thailand - United Nations Development
Programme - USA - World Council of Churches - World Health Organisation
-
|
| 6
November 2003
|
4th
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN
Programme of Action on Small Arms
The 4th meeting
of the Geneva Process on small arms discussed overall preparations
for the First UN Biennial Meeting to consider implementation of
the Programme of Action and, in particular, optional guidelines
for states to consult in the process of preparing national reports
for the Biennial Metting.
|
Chair:
Ambassador Christopher Westdal, Permanent Representative
of Canada to the Conference on Disarmament
Patricipants:
Arias
Foundation - Australia - Austria - Belgium - Biting the Bullet/Saferworld
- Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China - Colombia -
France - India - IANSA - Ireland - Japan - Mali - Norway - Peru
- Russian Federation - Small Arms Survey - South Africa - Sweden
- Switzerland - Thailand - United Kingdom - UNDP - UNHCHR - USA
- World Council of Churches - World Health Organisation -
|
| 27
August 2002
|
3rd
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN
Programme of Action on Small Arms
This
third meeting of the Geneva process began, as usual, with the
Geneva Forum distributing
to participants an updated and expanded "composite document"
containing detailed information on the implementation of the Programme
of Action (PoA) worldwide. The main purpose of this meeting was
to exchange experience in appointing national points of contact
to act as liaison between states on matters relating to the implementation
of the PoA. In advance of the meeting, the Geneva Forum had circulated
a list of detailed questions on this issue, the responses to which
formed the basis of discussion. The meeting also discussed in detail
the resolution on small arms that would be placed before the 57th
session of the UN General Assembly later this year, with the Japanese
Disarmament Ambassador providing an overview of the content of the
draft resolution. A detailed discussion developed on the importance
of beginning preparations as soon as possible for the first biennial
meeting in 2003 where states will report on their efforts to date
to implement the PoA. A procedure was agreed by participants,
which could allow a chair designate for the biennial meeting to
be identified
shortly, allowing in turn the UN Department for Disarmament Affairs
to assist the chair designate with early and comprehensive preparations.
|
Chair:
Ambassador Christopher Westdal, Permanent Representative
of Canada to the Conference on Disarmament
Participants:
Australia - Austria - Belgium - Biting the Bullet - Bulgaria
- Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - France - International
Committee of the Red Cross - India - Ireland - Japan - Kenya - Netherlands
- New Zealand - Norway - Small Arms Survey - South Africa - Switzerland
- Thailand - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs - UN Development
Programme - Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
- UK - USA -
|
| 25
June 2002
|
2nd
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN
Programme of Action on Small Arms
This
second meeting of the Geneva Process on implementing the UN Programme
of
Action (PoA) on small arms was the first to be chaired by a government
representative. The purpose of the meeting was to facilitate an
initial exchange of national experience in implementing the Programme
of Action to date. To prepare the ground for this discussion, the
Geneva Forum distributed at the meeting a composite document containing
information related to implementing the PoA gleaned from a variety
of sources. This document will be continually updated as the Geneva
Process generates new information and will serve as a useful central
source of information relating to PoA implementation. The UN Department
for Disarmament Affairs provided an update of its work concerning
the PoA, including a feasibility study being conducted by a group
of governmental experts on tracing illicit small arms and the compilation
of a list of National Points of Contact on the illicit trade in
small arms. The Small Arms Survey requested feedback from participants
on the utility of developing optional guidelines that states could
consult in the process of preparing national reports for the 2003
biennial meeting.
|
Chair:
Ambassador Christopher Westdal, Permanent Representative
of Canada to the Conference on Disarmament
Participants:
Australia
- Bulgaria - Canada - Chile - Colombia - France - India - Ireland
- Japan - Kenya - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway - South Africa
- Sweden - Switzerland - Thailand - UK - USA - Biting the Bullet
- Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - Small Arms Survey - UN Department
for Disarmament Affairs - UN Development Programme - Office of the
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights - World Health Organisation
- Geneva Forum partner organisations -
|
| 17
May 2002
|
1st
Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN
Programme of Action on Small Arms
This
meeting marked the beginning of a new Geneva Forum initiative
to create
a "Geneva Process" in support of implementing the UN Programme
of Action on small arms and light weapons adopted in July 2001.
The initiative aims to harness the critical mass of small arms expertise
that exists in Geneva by creating a forum of committed actors that
would meet on a regular basis in support of individual government,
regional and global initiatives towards the implementation of the
Programme of Action. The overall intention is that this Geneva-based
process will help to build political will for concrete steps to
tackle the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons and will
create an environment for exchanging information as well as discussing
specific needs and steps in the run-up to the first biennial meeting
in 2003. Participants expressed broad support for the initiative
and for the purpose and principles outlined in the "framework
document" distributed by the Geneva Forum, which acts as core
set of principles for the process.
|
| |