Home > Activity Overview > Small Arms > The Geneva Process > Activities

The Geneva Process on Small Arms
Activities

Date

Theme

Speakers/Participants

22 April 2008

Geneva Process on Small Arms

This was a special meeting of the Geneva Process timed to coincide with the second visit to Geneva of Ambassador Dalius Cekuolis of Lithuania in his capacity of Chair-designate of the 3rd biennial meeting of States to consider implementation of the UN Programme of Action.

The meeting focused on the role of the four Facilitators appointed by Ambassador Cekuolis in preparing, structuring and following up on the substantive discussions that will take place at the biennial meeting on (1) International cooperation and assistance and national capacity-building; (2) illicit brokering; (3) stockpile management and surplus disposal, and (4) the International Tracing Instrument. We invited the facilitators on each of these issues – Colombia, Republic of Korea, Switzerland and Egypt, respectively – to brief us on their plans in this regard. Our meeting also explored how to transform the substantive discussions at the biennial meeting into concrete, action-oriented outcomes and how the Geneva Process might be able to assist and support the Facilitators in their important task.

Chair:
Ambassador Kari Kahiluoto
Permanent Representative of Finland to the Conference on Disarmament

Speaker:
Ambassador Dalius Cekuolis
Permanent Representative of Lithuania to the United Nations in New York; Chair-designate of the third biennial meeting of States

Ambassador Clemencia Forero Ucros
Permanent Represntative of Colombia to the UN

Mr. Reto Wollenmann
Counsellor of Military Affairs, Delegation of Switzerland to the Conference on Disarmament

Ms. Angela Robinson of Australia
Acting Coordinator of the Working Group on BMS, Third Secretary, Permanent Mission of Australia to the UN

5 February
2008
Geneva Process on Small Arms

The meeting was dedicated to an informal discussion with the Chair-designate of the third biennial meeting of States, Ambassador Dalius Cekuolis, Permanent Representative of Lithuania to the United Nations in New York, who was in Geneva to conduct open-ended consultations. In order not to duplicate the general discussions that may take place during his open-ended consultations, our meeting focused specifically on the important question of identifying priority issues for the biennial meeting, as stipulated by the 62nd UN General Assembly small arms omnibus resolution (A/RES/62/47).

Chair:
Ambassador Kari Kahiluoto
Permanent Representative of Finland to the Conference on Disarmament

Speaker:
Ambassador Dalius Cekuolis
Permanent Representative of Lithuania to the United Nations in New York; Chair-designate of the third biennial meeting of States

11 December
2007
Geneva Process on Small Arms

The substantive focus of the meeting was on ammunition tracing. We also took the opportunity to review small arms-related work in this year’s First Committee and assess its implications for how the Geneva Process should carry out its work during 2008, in particular in the run-up to the July 14-18 biennial meeting of States.

Time was reserved at the end of the meeting for reports and updates from participants on recent and upcoming events and activities related to the implementation of the UN Programme of Action.

Chair:
Mr. Tim Caughley
Director, Geneva Branch, UN Office for Disarmament Affairs

Speaker:
Mr. James Bevan
Researcher at the Small Arms Survey

4 October 2007 Geneva Process on Small Arms

Following on from the substantive focus of the previous meeting on transfer controls and diversion, we briefly reviewed the Canadian Informal Meeting on Transfer Control Principles for Small Arms and Light Weapons, held in Geneva on August 27-31, and discussed its contribution to implementing the UN Programme of Action’s provisions on this issue.

The main focus of the meeting was on the report and recommendations of the Group of Governmental Experts on Illicit Brokering in SALW (A/62/163 of 27 July 2007) and, more specifically, on how these recommendations could best be implemented. The main speakers presented the report.

Time at the end of the meeting was reserved for reports and updates from participants on recent and upcoming events related to the implementation of the UN Programme of Action on small arms.

Chair:
Mr. Tim Caughley
Director, Geneva Branch, UN Office for Disarmament Affairs

Speakers:
Mr. Daniël Prins
Chair of the Group of Government Experts on Illicit Brokering of Small Arms and Light Weapons; Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Mr. Brian Wood
Consultant to the Group of Governmental Experts; Research Manager, Amnesty International

24 August 2007 Geneva Process on Small Arms

The meeting was chaired by Mr. Tim Caughley, Director of the Geneva Branch of the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, who took over from Ambassador Millar of Australia and who coordinated the work of the Geneva Process for the remainder of this year.

The substantive focus of the meeting was on transfer controls. Mr. Nicholas Marsh of the International Peace Research Institute, Oslo, made a presentation on the modalities and responses to the diversion of small arms into the illicit trade. Also, following up on the brief initial presentation of the working group papers at the last Geneva Proces meeting, a more in-depth discussion of the paper presented by the working group on biennial meetings of States took place.

This was also a brief update from the omnibus resolution co-authors on progress with the year’s main First Committee resolution on small arms and light weapons.

Chair:
Mr. Tim Caughley

Director, Geneva Branch, UN Office for Disarmament Affairs


Speakers:
Mr. Nicholas Marsh,

Project Leader and Researcher,
Norwegian Initiative on Small Arms Transfers, International Peace Research Institute, Oslo

19 June 2007 Geneva Process on Small Arms 

The first part of the meeting was devoted to reports from the Coordinators of the two Geneva Process working groups on, respectively, improving the effectiveness of biennial meetings of States and improving mechanisms for assessing needs and matching them with resources in the context of implementing the Programme of Action. In the second part of the meeting, we heard a presentation from Mr. Richard Kidd of the U.S. State Department on small arms surplus destruction and stockpile management.

Chair:
H.E. Ms. Caroline Millar

Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Australia to the United Nations

Invited Speaker:
Mr. Richard Kidd
Director, Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement, Bureau of Political & Military Affairs, U.S. Department of State


16 April 2007 Geneva Process on Small Arms

The substantive core of the meeting focussed on small arms export and brokering controls. Mr. Ted Seay, Senior Political Advisor with the Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies shared experiences on these subjects.
The Coordinators of the Geneva Process working groups on needs and resources (Colombia) and
biennial meetings of States (Finland) provided updates on the work of their respective groups,
which were established at the last meeting at the end of February.

Chair:
H.E. Ms. Caroline Millar

Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Australia to the United Nations

Invited Speaker:
Mr. Ted Seay
Senior Political Advisor, Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies


26 February 2007

Geneva Process on Small Arms

This meeting was designed to inform about the launch of a renewed and strengthened “Geneva process” to promote effective implementation of the UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (PoA).

The initiative being launched by the Geneva Forum aims to provide States committed to addressing small arms proliferation and misuse with a forum in which they can make real progress towards achieving specific objectives; namely:

  • To promote, monitor and assess progress towards effective implementation of the PoA, especially by States participating in the initiative.
  • To help develop effective mechanisms for assessing needs and matching them with resources to facilitate PoA implementation.
  • To develop options and proposals for making biennial meetings of States as effective as possible in promoting PoA implementation and in advancing understanding of the small arms problem worldwide.
  • To coordinate and share information on relevant national, regional and global initiatives related to PoA implementation in order to promote and capture synergies across regions and processes.

Chair:
H.E. Ms. Caroline Millar

Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Australia to the United Nations


 

 

Beginning of Phase II of the Geneva Process on Small Arms

 

 
25 September 2006

29th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

Following the disappointing outcome of the PoA Review Conference, this meeting focused on learning from what went wrong, identifying promising avenues for future action based on agreements almost reached at the Review Conference, and discussing draft resolutions relating to small arms to be introduced at First Committee.


Chair:
Dr. David Atwood,

Director, Quaker United Nations Office

Participants:
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bradford University, Canada, China, European Commission, Finland, France, Germany, Groupe de Recherche et d'Information sur la Paix et la Sécurité (GRIP), Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA), International Committe of the Red Cross (ICRC), India, Israel, Japan, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Oxfam, Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies (PSIS), Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO), Russia, Small Arms Survey (SAS), Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United nations Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR), United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), USA, World Council of Churches (WCC), World Health Organisation (WHO)

2 May 2006

28th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

The meeting was divided into four parts. The first part focused on the issue of small arms and development.

In advance of the release of the President-designate’s fourth non-paper on “follow-up,” the second part of the meeting focused on the preferences of Geneva Process participants regarding how best to follow up on the work of the first Review Conference, including such issues as implementation reporting, intersessional meetings of States, a further Review Conference, etc.

The third part of the meeting was designed to provide participants with an opportunity to share and discuss draft language that they are preparing for any part of the Review Conference outcome document.

The final segment of the meeting was reserved for the sharing of information on small arms-related issues, including recent or upcoming conferences, the publication of new reports, etc.

Chair:
H.E. Mr. Wegger Christian Strømmen,

Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Norway to the United Nations

Invited Speaker:
Mr. Nicholas Marsh,

International Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO)
Report back on the 22-23 March Oslo conference on “Integrating a Development Component into the UN Program of Action Process”

Participants:
Australia, Austria, Canada, Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, Chile, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Groupe de recherche et d'Information sur la paix et la sécurité (GRIP), India, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), International Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), Ireland, Israel, Kenya, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Oxfam, Peru, Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies (PSIS), Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO), Russian Federation, Saferworld, Small Arms Survey, Sweden, Switzerland, UK, UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF), UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA), UN Development Programme (UNDP), UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR), World Council of Churches

29 March 2006

27th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

The meeting, which took place between the President-designate's March 27 and March 30 consultations in New York, was devoted to a discussion of part 2 of his non-paper on "Concrete Measures to Strengthen Implementation at National, Regional and Global Levels" of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms. This non-paper was circulated the day before to Permanent Missions in New York.

Chair:
H.E. Mr. Wegger Christian Strømmen,

Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Norway to the United Nations

Participants:
Australia, Austria, Bulgaria, Canada, Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, Chile, China, Egypt, European Commission, Finland, France, Franciscans International, Germany, India, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Israel, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Oxfam / Control Arms, Peru, Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO), Saferworld, Small Arms Survey, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, UK, UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA), UN Development Programme (UNDP), UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR), USA, World Council of Churches

20 March 2006 26th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

The meeting was devoted to an exchange of views with the President-designate of the first PoA Review Conference, Ambassador Prasad Kariyawasam of Sri Lanka. The participation of Ambassador Kariyawasam provided a valuable opportunity to Geneva Process participants to provide input and suggestions to the President-designate on the Review Conference and its outcome.

Chair:
H.E. Mr. Wegger Christian Strømmen,
Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Norway to the United Nations

Invited Speakers:
Mr. Peter Weiderud,
Director, Commission of the Churches on International Affairs, World Council of Churches

H.E. Mr. Prasad Kariyawasam,
Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the United Nations, New York; President-designate of the first Review Conference of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms and Light Weapons

Participants:
Australia, Austria, Biting the Bullet (Saferworld and University of Bradford), Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, Chile, China, Colombia, Egypt, European Commission, Finland, France, Franciscans International, Germany, Groupe de recherche et d'Information sur la paix et la sécurité (GRIP), India, International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA), International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Israel, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Oxfam / Control Arms, Peru, Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies (PSIS), Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO), Russian Federation, Small Arms Survey, Sri Lanka, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA), UN Development Programme (UNDP), UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR), USA, World Council of Churches

1 March 2006 25th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

The starting-point of our meeting was a reflection on the Review Conference Preparatory Committee that took place in New York in January. In particular, it was useful to focus on lessons that can be learned from the PrepCom that might be useful in helping governments prepare for the Review Conference.

The core of our meeting focused on preparations for the Review Conference itself. The focal-point was the non-paper by the Chair-designate of the Review Conference, Ambassador Prasad Kariyawasam of Sri Lanka. This non-paper set out some options regarding the substance of a draft final document of the Review Conference, as well as its indicative timetable and proceedings.

Chair:
H.E. Mr. Wegger Christian Strømmen, Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Norway to the United Nations

Participants:
Amnesty International, Arias Foundation for Peace and Human Progress, Australia, Austria, Biting the Bullet (Saferworld and University of Bradford), Belgium, Canada, Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, Chile, Egypt, European Commission, Finland, France, Franciscans International, Germany, Groupe de recherche et d'Information sur la paix et la sécurité (GRIP), India, International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA), International Alert, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Ireland, Israel, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Oxfam, Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO), Russian Federation, Saferworld, Small Arms Survey, South Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons (SEESAC), Sweden, Switzerland, UK, UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA), UN Development Programme (UNDP), UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR), USA, World Council of Churches, World Health Organisation (WHO)

15 December 2005 24th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

In response to an invitation by the Geneva Forum, the Chair-designate of the Preparatory Committee for the first Review Conference of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms – H.E. Dr. Sylvester E. Rowe, Ambassador of Sierra Leone to the UN in New York – visited Geneva on December 14-16. During his visit, he conducted open-ended and bilateral consultations with UN Member States and participated in numerous other meetings facilitated by the Geneva Forum.

A principal reason for his visit was to participate in the 24th meeting of the Geneva Process on small arms. The bulk of this meeting was dedicated to an exchange of views with Ambassador Rowe on substantive and procedural issues surrounding the Preparatory Committee as well as the Review Conference itself.

In addition, there was a brief presentation of the preliminary results of an analysis of all PoA national implementation reports submitted by States between 2002 and 2005. This analysis, in the process of being finalised by UNIDIR, UNDDA, UNDP and the Small Arms Survey, drew lessons from States’ reporting on their implementation of the PoA that have relevance for the Review Conference and its preparatory process. At the close of the meeting, Ambassador François Rivasseau of France reported on the progress of the Geneva Process sub-group on communications, established at our last meeting to develop strategies for raising public awareness of the humanitarian impact of small arms proliferation and misuse.

Chair:
H.E. Mr. Wegger Christian Strømmen
, Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Norway to the United Nations

Invited Speakers:
H.E. Dr. Sylvester E. Rowe
, Ambassador, Deputy Permanent Representative of Sierra Leone to the United Nations (New York); Chair-designate of the Small Arms Review Conference Preparatory Committee

Participants:
Australia - Austria - Belgium - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - Colombia - Egypt - European Commission - Finland - France - Germany - GRIP - International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) - International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - Ireland - Israel - Japan - Kenya - Mexico - Morocco - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway - Oxfam - Peru - Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO) Russian Federation - Saferworld - Sierra Leone - Small Arms Survey - Sweden - Switzerland - UK - UN Development Programme (UNDP) - UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) - USA - World Health Organisation (WHO)

 

15 November 2005 23rd Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

This meeting began with the usual exchange of information on global, regional and national initiatives related to the implementation of the UN Programme of Action. In particular, there were reports on a seminar organised by the Geneva Forum in Glen Cove, New York, on 30 September – 2 October; on the meeting of the Parliamentary Forum on Small Arms and Light Weapons held in Mexico City on 19-21 October; and on the ASEAN Regional Forum small arms seminar held in Phnom Penh on 2-4 November. The small arms-related draft resolutions adopted by the UN General Assembly’s First Committee were also presented.

The bulk of the meeting was devoted to discussing the preparatory process for the 2006 small arms Review Conference in light of the discussions that took place in First Committee. Ambassador Pasi Patokallio (Finland’s Ambassador to Canada) provided his perspective on the preparatory process, drawing in particular on his experience as Chair of the second Biennial Meeting of States in July 2005. The UN Department for Disarmament Affairs also briefed participants on open-ended consultations on the 2006 Review Conference held in New York on October 19. These presentations were followed by an open discussion on what needs to be achieved at the January Preparatory Committee and what form and approach it should take.

The final segment of the meeting returned to the question of awareness-raising around the small arms Programme of Action with a view to putting into motion some of the plans discussed in at previous meetings.

 

Chair:
H.E. Mr. Luis Alfonso de Alba
, Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Mexico to the United Nations.

Invited Speakers:
H.E. Mr. Pasi Patokallio
, Ambassador of Finland to Canada; Chair of the second Biennial Meeting of States to consider implementation of the UN Programme of Action on small arms

Participants:
Australia - Austria - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - European Commission - Finland - France - Germany - GRIP - International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) - International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - India - Ireland - Japan - Kenya - Mexico - National Commission Against Proliferation of Illicit Small Arms and Light Weapons (Sri Lanka) - Netherlands - Norway - Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) - Oxfam - Parliamentary Forum on Small Arms and Light Weapons - Peru - Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO) Russian Federation - Saferworld - Small Arms Survey - Sweden - UK - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA) - UN Development Programme (UNDP) - UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) - USA - World Health Organisation (WHO)

 

15 September 2005 22nd Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

The 22nd meeting of the Geneva Process on Small Arms dealt with the following issues:

  • Reflections on BMS2: The first part of the meeting reflected on the content and outcome of the second Biennial Meeting of States (BMS2), held at UN Headquarters in New York on 11-15 July 2005. The meeting reviewed the conclusions of the Biting the Bullet/IANSA “Red Book” on the state of PoA implementation. A representative of the UNDP/UNIDIR/UNDDA/Small Arms Survey PoA reporting assistance initiative provided a preliminary analysis of national reporting at BMS2, putting particular emphasis on what implications the contents of the 2005 national reports might have for preparations for the 2006 review conference.
  • Ambitions for the 2006 review conference: Geneva Process participants outlined their principal ambitions for the 2006 review conference, identifying areas of convergence and divergence in States’ visions of what the review conference is mandated to do and what it can achieve.
  • Preparations for First Committee: The UN General Assembly’s First Committee was scheduled to meet from October 3 to November 4. The meeting discussed the small arms-related draft resolutions and decisions that were currently being prepared by States as well as the question of how best to adopt – and activate – the tracing instrument. This year’s First Committee will also include a thematic discussion on small arms and light weapons, scheduled for one session during the second half of the second week. Participants also discussed how to make the most of the debate that would take place during First Committee.
  • Some elements of future work: This forward-looking segment of the meeting included a presentation on the work of the Parliamentary Forum on Small Arms and Light Weapons, a discussion on raising global public awareness of the impact of small arms proliferation and misuse, and some ideas about how the Geneva Process should organise its work over the coming year.

 

Chair:
H.E. Mr. Luis Alfonso de Alba
, Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Mexico to the United Nations.

Invited Speakers:
Ms. Maria J. Lundberg
, Parliamentary Forum on Small Arms and Light Weapons.

Participants:
Austria - Belgium - Biting the Bullet - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - European Commission - Finland - France - Germany - GRIP - India - International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) - International Alert - International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - Israel - Japan - Netherlands - Norway - Mexico - Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) - Parliamentary Forum on Small Arms and Light Weapons - Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO) - Russian Federation - Small Arms Survey - South Africa - Sweden - Switzerland - UK - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA) - UN Development Programme - UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) - USA - World Council of Churches -

 

28 June 2005

21st Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

The 21st meeting of the Geneva Process on small arms focused on the following issues:

  • Exchange of information: The meeting began with an exchange of information on global, regional and national initiatives related to the implementation of the UN Programme of Action. Participants provided brief reports of relevant activities, recent or planned, in their countries and regions.
  • The impact of Gun violence on humanitarian and Development Personnel: Robert Muggah (Small Arms Survey) provided a brief overview of the findings and recommendations of a recent study undertaken by the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue and the Small Arms Survey entitled, “No Relief: Surveying the effects of gun violence on humanitarian and development personnel.” The study was based on a survey of over 2,000 development professionals working for 17 UN agencies and international NGOs in 96 countries. As such, it is the largest aid worker study ever undertaken.
  • On the Eve of BMS2…: Just two weeks before the beginning of the second Biennial Meeting of States (BMS2), participants shared views on issues they planed to raise during the thematic debate, bearing in mind the questions proposed by the Chair-designate in his letter to UN Member States of May 20. They discussed how to make the most use of NGO participation and government-civil society interaction at BMS2. There was also a discussion on raising public awareness of the problems posed by the proliferation and misuse of small arms – and on ways of advancing this important work at BMS2 and in the run-up to the Review Conference. Finally, participants set out their respective visions of a successful outcome to BMS2.

Chair:
Dr. David Atwood
, Director, Quaker United Nations Office

Participants:
Australia - Austria - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - European Commission - Finland - France - Germany - GRIP - India - International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) - International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - Ireland - Japan - Kenya - Mexico - Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) - Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO) - Russian Federation - Small Arms Survey - Sweden - Switzerland - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA) - UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) - USA - World Council of Churches -

 

14 April 2005 20th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

The 20th meeting of the Geneva Process on small arms focused on the following issues:

  • Exchange of information: The meeting began with the usual exchange of information on global, regional and national initiatives related to the implementation of the UN Programme of Action. Information shared at the meeting was added to the online, searchable database hosted on the website of the Small Arms Survey.
  • Exchange of views with Ambassador Pasi Patokallio on a list of questions for BMS2: In his letter to UN Member States of 1 March 2005, the Chair-designate of the 2nd Biennial Meeting of States (BMS2), Ambassador Pasi Patokallio of Finland, announced his intention to prepare a list of questions to help participants prepare for the thematic debate. This exchange of views with Amb. Patokallio, which revolved around a list of suggested questions prepared by a group of Geneva Process participants, focused on how such a list of questions might be formulated to make best use of the thematic segment of BMS2.
  • Focus on small arms ammunition: The PoA is widely understood to encompass not only small arms and light weapons, but also their ammunition. However, progress in implementing the PoA in relation to ammunition is quite uneven, partly because ammunition is often considered to be a residual category under small arms agreements and partly because the control of ammunition presents its own set of problems. Dr. Owen Greene of Bradford University, UK, and Mr. Adrian Wilkinson of the South Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons (SEESAC) made introductory presentations on this issue. A recent Biting the Bullet report on ammunition stocks was made available to participants.
  • “In Larger Freedom;” the Secretary-General’s report and implications for small arms work in the United Nations: Kofi Annan’s report, “In larger freedom: towards development, security and human rights for all,” sets out an ambitious set of proposals and reforms that have potentially far-reaching implications for how the United Nations carries out its work. But what, if anything, does it imply for multilateral efforts to control the illicit small arms trade? Daniël Prins of the Netherlands Disarmament Mission took a close look at the report through a small arms lens and reported on what he found.

 

Chair:
Mr. Peter Herby
, Head, Mines/Arms Unit, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)

Invited Speakers:
H.E. Mr. Pasi Patokallio
, Ambassador of Finland to Canada and Chair-designate of the second Biennial Meeting of States to consider implementation of the UN Programme of Action on small arms

Dr. Owen Greene, Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, UK.

Mr. Adrian Wilkinson, Team Leader, South Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons (SEESAC), Serbia and Montenegro.

Mr. Daniël Prins, Counsellor, Delegation of the Kingdom of the Netherlands to the Conference on Disarmament.

Participants:
Australia - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China - Finland - France - Germany - Israel - International Alert - International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - Italy - Japan - Luxembourg - Mexico - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway - Peru - Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies (PSIS) - Quaker UN Office (QUNO) - Russian Federation - Ryerson University (Canada) - Saferworld - Small Arms Survey - South Africa - South Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons (SEESAC) - Sweden - Switzerland - Thailand - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA) - UN Development Programme (UNDP) - UN High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) - UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) - University of Bradford (UK) - USA - World Council of Churches - World Health Organisation (WHO) -

 

10 February 2005

19th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

This meeting was devoted to an exchange of views between Geneva Process participants and H.E. Mr. Pasi Patokallio – Ambassador of Finland to Canada and Chair-designate of the second Biennial Meeting of States to consider implementation of the UN Programme of Action on small arms – on the following questions:

  • Written National Reports: What should be the deadline for submitting national reports? How can they best be used in preparing the meeting?
  • Meeting Structure: How can BMS2 best be structured to consider (1) national implementation, (2) inputs from international, regional and nongovernmental organisations, and (3) thematic debate? How should time be divided up?
  • Thematic Debate: What is the process for determining the structure and content of the thematic debate? Does the Chair-designate plan to issue a set of guiding questions? Can some prominent themes already be identified?
  • NGO Participation: Should the entire meeting, including the thematic debate, to open to NGO participants? Could governments be formally encouraged to include NGO representatives and parliamentarians on their delegations?
  • Chair’s report: What format does the Chair-designate have in mind for his final report of the meeting?
  • BMS2 as a step on the road from 2001 to 2006: What is the Chair-designate’s vision of the role to be played by BMS2 in helping move the international community from the 2001 Conference to the 2006 Conference.
  • Communication with and support of the Chair-designate: How does the Chair-designate plan to communicate and interact with states, international organisations and NGOs in the run-up to the meeting? How can Geneva Process participants best support the work of the Chair-designate?


Chair:
David Atwood, Director, Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO)

Invited Speaker:
H.E. Mr. Pasi Patokallio
, Ambassador of Finland to Canada and Chair-designate of the second Biennial Meeting of States to consider implementation of the UN Programme of Action on small arms

Participants:
- Amnesty International - Australia - Austria - Belgium - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China - European Commission - Finland - France - Germany - India - International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) - International Alert - International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - Ireland - Israel - Japan - Kenya - Mexico - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway - Peru - Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies (PSIS) - Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO) - Russian Federation - Small Arms Survey - South Africa - Switzerland - UK - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA) - UN Development Programme (UNDP) - UN High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) - UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) - USA - World Council of Churches -

 

19 January 2005

18th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

The meeitng began, as usual, with a general round of information-sharing on global activities related to the implementation of the UN Programme of Action on small arms. This information is added to the ever-growing database on the Small Arms Survey website that tracks global implementation of the UN Programme of Action. The remainder the the meeting focuses on two issues:

Draft Tracing Instrument: The Chair of the Open-Ended Working Group on tracing small arms, Ambassador Anton Thalmann of Switzerland, had recently released a first draft on an “International Instrument for the Timely and Reliable Identification and Tracing of Illicit Small Arms and Light Weapons." Mr. Ilhan Berkol of the Groupe de recherche et d'Information sur la paix et la sécurité (GRIP) in Belgium made an introductory presentation on the draft text, which was followed by a discussion.

The Second Biennial Meeting of States: Participants discussed the following questions concerning the structure and themes of the second Biennial Meeting of States (BMS2) to review implementation of the UN Programme of Action, scheduled to take place on 11-15 July 2005:

  • Structure: Concrete suggestions regarding how the agenda of BMS2 could best be structured to consider national implementation; inputs from nongovernmental, international and regional organisations; and thematic debate. The lessons to be drawn from BMS1 regarding how best to structure BMS2?
  • Themes: Suggestions regarding the specific issues to be discussed during the thematic debate at BMS2 For example; should themes be identified in advance of the meeting or allowed to emerge during the meeting itself; would it be better to select a small number of themes or have a wider-ranging debate on many issues; would it be helpful to structure the thematic debate through the use of questionnaires or other devices, etc.?

Chair:
Mr. Peter Herby
, Head, Mines/Arms Unit, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)

Invited Speaker:
Mr. Ilhan Berkol
, Senior Researcher, Groupe de recherche et d'Information sur la paix et la sécurité (GRIP), Belgium
Presentation - 28KB

Participants:
Amnesty International - Australia - Austria - Belgium - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China - Finland - France - Germany - India -International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) - International Alert - International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - Israel - Japan - Kenya - Landmine Action UK - Mexico - Netherlands - North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) - Norway - Oxfam - Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies (PSIS) - Project Ploughshares - Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO) - Russian Federation - SaferAfrica - Saferworld - Small Arms Survey - Sweden - Switzerland - Thailand - UK - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA) - UN Development Programme (UNDP) - UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) - UN Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights - University of Bradford - USA

 

17 November 2004 17th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

This meeting focused on three main issues:

Recent activities around the world connected with implementing the UN Programme of Action on small arms: An overview was presented of information collected since the previous Geneva Process meeting on activities in various countries and regions related to the implementation of the UN Programme of Action. Further information was also provided by representatives of Sweden, Thailand, QUNO and Saferworld. The information shared was entered into the Geneva Process Programme of Action Implementation database, hosted by the Small Arms Survey.

Small arms-related work at the UN General Assembly First Committee: Participants discussed the various small arms-related draft resolutions and decisions to emerge from the 2004 session of the UN General Assembly First Committee (4 October – 5 November) as well as their implications for preparations for the 2005 Biennial Meeting of States and the 2006 Review Conference. The discussion also included feedback on the informal consultations of the Open-Ended Working Group on tracing small arms that took place on the margins of the First Committee.

Raising global public awareness of the humanitarian consequences of the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons: Simon Gray of Oxfam Great Britain’s Campaigns Department gave a presentation on the importance of raising global public awareness of the humanitarian consequences of the proliferation and misuse of small arms and light weapons and on ways and means of doing so. Participants discussed the role that governments and organisations participating in the Geneva Process might play in making the public more aware of small arms-related problems.

 

Chair:
Mr. Peter Herby
, Head, Mines/Arms Unit, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)

Invited Speaker:
Mr. Simon Gray
, Campaigns Department, Oxfam Great Britain.
Presentation - 271KB


Participants:
Austria - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - Finland - France - Germany - India - International Alert - International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - Japan - Mexico - Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) - Oxfam Great Britain - Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies (PSIS) - Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO) - Russian Federation - Saferworld - Small Arms Survey - Sweden - Switzerland - Thailand - UK - UN Development Programme (UNDP) - UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) - USA - World Council of Churches -

 

8 September 2004

16th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

This meeting began with a general round of information-sharing on global activities related to the implementation of the UN Programme of Action. This information is added to the ever-growing database on the Small Arms Survey website that tracks global implementation of the UN Programme of Action.

The principal procedural issues discussed at this meeting were:

  • Visions for the 2006 Review Conference, i.e., what do Geneva Process participants hope will be the main outcomes of the 2006 review conference and what, therefore, should be the key elements of the review conference discussion?
  • Preparations for the 2005 Biennial Meeting of States, i.e., what should the agenda of the 2005 BMS look like?

The substantive segment of the meeting focused on Man-portable Air Defence Systems (MANPADS) and on national, regional and international efforts to prevent their illicit proliferation and misuse. A presentation by James Bevan of the Small Arms Survey formed the core of this discussion.

The meeting also examined the progress of draft resolutions being prepared for the 59th session of the UNGA First Committee and included a briefing by the Geneva Process Chair on a planned press/media event to highlight the work that the Geneva Process is doing to help implement the UN Programme of Atction on small arms.

 

Chair:
Ambassador François Rivasseau, Premanent Representative of France to the Conference on Disarmament

Invited Speaker:
Mr. James Bevan
, Researcher, Small Arms Survey
Presentation - 150KB

Participants:
Amnesty International - Australia - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China - Colombia - Finland - France - Germany - International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) - International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - India - Institute for Security Studies, South Africa - Japan - Mexico - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway - Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) - Oxfam GB - Oxfam International - Peru - Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies, IUHEI - Quaker United Nations Office - Russian Federation - SaferAfrica - Saferworld - Small Arms Survey - South Africa - Sweden - Switzerland - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA) - UN Development Programme (UNDP) - UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) - World Council of Churches -

 

1 July 2004

15th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

This meeting of the Geneva Process on small arms began with an exchange of information on global implementation of the UN Programme of Action on small arms and light weapons. The remainder of the meeting dealt with three main issues; (1) the Open-Ended Working Group on Tracing Small Arms, (2) the broad-based consultations on small arms brokering, and (3) preparations for the 2005 Biennial Meeting of States (BMS) and the 2006 meeting to review implementation of the Programme of Action.

Brian Wood of Amnesty International reported back on the broad-based consultations on small arms brokering that took place in New York on 11 June, organised by the UN Department for Disarmament Affairs. The discussion on this issue centred on assessing the outcome of the Geneva and New York consultations to date and on next steps that might be taken on this issue, including preparations for this year’s meting of the UN General Assembly’s (UNGA) First Committee.

Thomas Greminger of the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs reported to the group on the outcome of the first substantive session of the Open Ended Working Group on Tracing Small Arms, which took place in New York on 14-25 June. Participants went on to discuss what needed to be done in advance of the second substantive session, scheduled to take place early in 2005.

Participants also exchanged views on preparations for the second Biennial Meeting of States (BMS) in 2005, in particular what needs to be done before, during and after the UNGA First Committee to ensure that the meeting is a success. Participants also discussed what would have to be done now and at the second BMS to lay the proper groundwork for the 2006 review meeting.

 

Chair:
Ambassador François Rivasseau, Premanent Representative of France to the Conference on Disarmament

Invited Speakers:

Mr. Brian Wood, Amnesty International

Mr. Thomas Greminger, Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs

Participants:
Amnesty International - Australia - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China - Colombia - Egypt - France - Germany - International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) - International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - India - International Alert - Ireland - Japan - Mexico - New Zealand - Norway - Peru - Quaker UN Office (QUNO) - Sofia University, Tokyo - Sweden - Switzerland - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA) - UN Development Programme (UNDP) - Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) - UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) - United States of America - World Council of Churches -

 

7 June 2004

14th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

The 14th meeting of the Geneva Process on small arms focused on the issue of small arms demand. Participants explored what is actually meant when one speaks of “demand” for small arms and light weapons, how the issue of demand relates to the UN Programme of Action, and what the latest research on small arms demand tells us.

The discussion was preceded by three introductory presentations: David Atwood, Director of the Quaker United Nations Office, highlighted those elements of the UN Programme of Action on small arms that relate to addressing the demand for small arms and light weapons. Keith Krause and Robert Muggah, Director and Senior Researcher, respectively, at the Small Arms Survey, focused on the research agenda surrounding the question of small arms demand and presented preliminary results from research recently carried out in the Solomon Islands and Papua New Guinea.

Participants also continued the general exchange of views, initiated at the previous Geneva Process meeting, on the 2nd Biennial Meeting of States. They outlined their expectations for this meeting and provided some suggestions as to how the Geneva Process might foster good preparation for it.

During the segment set aside for sharing information on global implementation of the UN Programme of Action, Ambassador Christian Faessler of Switzerland briefed participants on the Open-Ended Working Group on Tracing Small Arms and the non-paper produced by the Group’s Chairman; Philip Owade of Kenya introduced the newly signed Nairobi Protocol on Small Arms and Light Weapons; Valère Mantels of UNDDA briefed participants on the progress of the broad-based consultations on small arms brokering; and Valerie Yankey provided her usual overview of recent activities around the world aimed at implementing the UN Programme of Action on small arms.

Chair:
Ambassador François Rivasseau, Premanent Representative of France to the Conference on Disarmament

Speakers:

Dr. David Atwood, Director, Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva

Prof. Keith Krause, Programme Director, Small Arms Survey

Mr. Robert Muggah, Senior Researcher, Small Arms Survey

Participants:
Australia - Austria - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China - France - Germany - International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) - International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - India - International Alert - Japan - Kenya - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway - Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies (PSIS) - Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO) - Russian Federation - Small Arms Survey - South Africa - Sri Lanka - Switzerland - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA) - UN Development Programme (UNDP) - UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) - United Kingdom - United States of America -

 

6 April 2004

13th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

The 13th meeting of the Geneva Process on small arms focused on the “Vienna Firearms Protocol” or, to give it its full title, The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime.

This Protocol was opened for signature in the same month – July 2001 – that the UN Conference agreed on its Programme of Action (PoA) on the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons. In contrast to the UN PoA, the Vienna Firearms Protocol is a legally binding global instrument that covers many of the pressing issues being discussed today within the framework of the UN PoA and elsewhere – e.g., marking and tracing, export controls, stockpile management, brokering, collection and destruction, criminalisation, and international cooperation and assistance. An important difference between the Firearms Protocol and the UN PoA, however, is that the former only addresses commercial transactions in firearms, and exempts state-to-state transactions and transfers.

The Vienna Firearms Protocol has not yet entered into force and, in fact, is making quite slow progress towards doing so. To date, while 51 countries and the European Union have signed the Firearms Protocol, only 14 have ratified it (40 ratifications are required for the Protocol to enter into force).

Mr. Eduardo Vetere, Director of the Division for Treaty Affairs at the UN Office for Drugs and Crime in Vienna, gave a presentation on the Protocol, covering its genesis and raison d’etre, its adoption by the General Assembly and opening for signature in 2001, and a detailed analysis of its provisions.

Mr. Michael Hallowes, Detective Chief Inspector with the Metropolitan Police Service at New Scotland Yard in London, made a presentation giving a policing perspective on the Vienna Firearms Protocol, with particular emphasis on its provisions on criminalisation, record-keeping and marking.

A portion of the meeting was also devoted to a preliminary discussion of the 2nd Biennial Meeting of States (BMS) to consider implementation of the UN PoA, scheduled to take place in 2005. Participants briefly outlined their expectations for this meeting as well as their ideas on how the Geneva Process might foster good preparation for it.

 

Chair:
Mr. Prosper Bani, United Nations Development Programme

Invited Speakers:

Mr. Eduardo Vetere, Director, Division for Treaty Affairs, United Nations Office for Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Vienna.
Presentation - 78KB

Mr. Michael Hallowes, Detective Chief Inspector, Metropolitan Police Service, New Scotland Yard, London.
Presentation -
472KB

Participants:
Australia - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China - France - International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) - International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - India - Kenya - New Scotland Yard - Norway - Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies (PSIS) - Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO) - Russian Federation - Small Arms Survey - South Africa - Sweden - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs (UNDDA) - UN Development Programme (UNDP) - Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) - UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) - UN Office on Drugs and Crime - UK - USA -

 

20 February 2004

12th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

The 12th meeting of the Geneva Process on small arms had as its main focus a detailed exposition of the draft “Framework Convention on International Arms Transfers” (more commonly known as the “Arms Trade Treaty”), a nongovernmental initiative that is being promoted by the recently launched “Control Arms” campaign headed by Oxfam, Amnesty International and the International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA).

Debbie Hillier of Oxfam GB gave a detailed presentation on the background, content and future development of the Arms Trade Treaty, which was followed by a detailed discussion. In addition, the UN Development Programme (UNDP) provided an update on their project on “Capacity Building for Reporting to the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms” and the Geneva Forum reported back on a two-day meeting it had held on “The Role of Regional Organisations in Stemming the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons.”

 

Chair:
Mr. Prosper Bani, United Nations Development Programme

Invited Speakers:

Ms. Debbie Hillier, Policy Advisor, Oxfam Great Britain
Presentation - 781KB

Participants
Australia - Austria - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China - France - India - International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) - International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - Japan - Kenya - Netherlands - Norway - Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCHR) - Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) - Oxfam GB - Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies (PSIS) - Quaker UN Office (QUNO) - Russian Federation - Saferworld - Small Arms Survey - Sweden - Switzerland - UK - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs - UN Development Programme - UN Institute for Disarmament Research - USA -World Council of Churches -

 

10 December 2003

11th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

The 11th meeting of the Geneva Process to promote implementation of the UN Programme of Action on small arms and light weapons had as its focus the issue of small arms brokering. Introductory presentations on this issue were given by Mr. Brian Wood of Amnesty International, who outlined the nature and extent of the problem, Ambassadors Chris Sanders (The Netherlands) and Sten Anders Berge (Norway), who gave an introduction to the Dutch/Norwegian initiative on small arms brokering and, in particular, the initiative’s activities at the regional level, and Ms. Silvia Cattaneo of the Small Arms Survey, who presented a review of national legislation regulating the activities of small arms brokers.

The meeting also included the usual exchange of information related to the global implementation of the UN Programme of Action, as well as the introduction of the OSCE handbook of best practices on small arms and light weapons and volume 2 of the publication “The Geneva Forum: Seminars on Small Arms.”

 

Chair:
Mr. Prosper Bani, United Nations Development Programme 

Invited Speakers:

Mr. Brian Wood, Amnesty International

Ambassador Chris Sanders, Permanent Representative of the Netherlands to the Conference on Disarmament

Ambassador Sten Anders Berge, Ambassador-at-large for Small Arms, Norway

Ms. Silvia Cattaneo, Researcher, Small Arms Survey

Patricipants:
Amnesty International - Arias Foundation - Australia - Austria - Bulgaria - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China - Colombia - France - India - Institute for Security Studies (South Africa) - International Action Network on Small Arms - International Alert - International Committee of the Red Cross - Ireland - Japan - Monterrey Institute of International Studies - Netherlands - Norway - Peru - Project Ploughshares - Saferworld - Small Arms Survey - South Africa - Sweden - Switzerland - Thailand - United Kingdom - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs - UN Development Programme - United States of America - Viva Rio - World Council of Churches - Geneva Forum Partner Organisations -

 

10 September 2003

10th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

The 10th meeting of the Geneva Process took stock of the First Biennial Meeting of States (BMS) to review implementation of the UN Programme of Action on small arms and discussed what needed to happen in the area of small arms controls before the Second BMS in 2005 and the first Review Conference in 2006.

Opening presentations on these issues were made by Dr. Joao Honwana (Director of the Conventional Arms Branch of the UN Department for Disarmament Affairs), Ms. Ann Pollack (Deputy Permanent Representative of Canada to the Conference on Disarmament) and Mr. Henry Smith (Head of Arms and Security at Saferworld/Biting the Bullet). Participants also shared new information related to the worldwide implementation of the UN Programme of action, including information on a new training handbook from Saferworld/Oxfam/International Alert entitled “Action Against Small Arms, on the updated Programme of Action Implementation Database and on donor support for small arms programmes.

Chair:
Dr. David Atwood, Director, Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva (standing in for Ambassador Camillo Reyes Rodriguez of Colombia)

Invited Speakers:

Dr. Joao Honwana, Director, Conventional Arms Branch, UN Department for Disarmament Affairs

Ms. Ann Pollack, Deputy Permanent Representative of Canada to the Conference on Disarmament

Mr. Henry Smith, Head of Arms and Security, Saferworld

Participants:
Australia - Biting the Bullet - Bulgaria - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China - Colombia - France - International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) - India - Ireland - Japan - Kenya - New Zealand - Russian Federation - Small Arms Survey - South Africa - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs - UN Development Programme - USA, World Health Organisation - Geneva Forum Partner Organisations -

 

24 June 2003

 

 

9th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

The 9th meeting of the Geneva Process on small arms - the last before the first UN Biennial Meeting to consider implementation of the Programme of Action (7-11 July 2003, New York) - considered how to make the most of the thematic discussion scheduled to take place at the first UN Biennial meeting. Participants also cast a critical eye on the work of the Geneva Process since its first meeting on 17 May 2002, decided to continue the Geneva Process on small arms following the Biennial Meeting and offered some ideas regarding its future shape and work.

Chair:
Ambassador Camillo Reyes Rodriguez, Permanent Representative of Colombia to the United Nations

Participants:
Australia - Bulgaria - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China - Colombia - International Committee of the Red Cross - Ireland - Japan - Mali - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway - Small Arms Survey - Switzerland - Thailand - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs - UN Development Programme - USA - World Council of Churches - World Health Organisation - Geneva Forum Partner Organisations -

 

22 May 2003

 

8th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

The 8th meeting of the Geneva Process on small arms considered the following issues:

  • Regional approaches to tackling the problem of small arms using the example of West Africa. Mr. Conmany B. Wesseh, Steering Committee Chair of the West African Action Network on Small Arms, made a presentation detailing the challenges and opportunities involved in addressing the problem of small arms in this region.
  • Ambassador Kuniko Inoguchi of Japan (Chair-designate of the first UN Biennial Meeting to consider implementation of the UN Programme of Action) provided an update on preparations for the Biennial Meeting and on emerging issues for this meeting's thematic discussion.
  • Mr. Iain Hall of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees provided a UN Agency perspective on the problems associated with the wide availability and use of small arms in the context of humanitarian operations in the field.

 

Chair:
Ambassador Camillo Reyes Rodriguez, Permanent Representative of Colombia to the United Nations

Invited Speakers:

Mr. Conmany B. Wesseh, West African Action Network on Small Arms

Ambassador Kuniko Inoguchi, Permanent Representative of Japan to the Conference on Disarmament

Mr. Iain Hall, Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees

Participants:
Australia - Biting the Bullet - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China - Colombia - France - India - International Action Network on Small Arms - International Committee of the Red Cross - Japan - Mali - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway - Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees - Peru - Small Arms Survey - Sweden Switzerland - Thailand - UK - UN Development Programme - USA - West African Action Network on Small Arms - World Council of Churches - World Health Organisation -

 

2 April 2003

 

7th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

The 7th meeting of the Geneva Process on small arms involved a general exchange of ideas, intentions and hopes for the first UN biennial meeting to consider implementation of the Programme of Action. This exchange included, in particular, the perspectives of governments, civil society and International Organisations.

The previous meeting of the Geneva Process underlined the importance of ensuring high quality reporting to the first biennial meeting and discussed ways and means of evaluating the progress and impact of implementing the Programme of Action. This meeting followed up on that discussion in a more general way by posing the question: what do governments, civil society and international organisations hope to achieve at the first UN biennial meeting? In other words, how are they approaching the meeting in general, what are their intentions regarding their participation in the meeting, and what do they hope the outcome of the meeting will be?

 

Chair:
Dr. Peter Batchelor, Project Director, Small Arms Survey

Participants:
Australia - Austria - Belgium - Bulgaria - Canada - Colombia - India - International Action Network on Small Arms - International Committee of the Red Cross - Ireland - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway - Peru - Russian Federation - Small Arms Survey - South Africa - Sweden - Switzerland - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs - UN Development Programme - USA - World Council of Churches - World Health Organisation -

 

11 February 2003

 

6th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

The 6th meeting of the Geneva Process on small arms addressed the following issues:

  • Strengthening the capacity of states - especially those most affected by small arms - to report to the first UN Biennial Meeting to consider implementation of the Programme of Action.
  • Measuring Success: Indicators of PoA implementation and its impact. What indicators could countries use to measure the successful implementation of the PoA at the national level? How would countries assess the “impact” of successful implementation of the PoA, and what indicators could be used for such an assessment?

 

Chair:
Dr. Peter Batchelor, Project Director, Small Arms Survey

Participants:
Australia - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China - Colombia - India - Ireland - Japan - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway - Peru - Small Arms Survey - Sweden - Switzerland - Thailand - United Nations Development Programme - UK - USA - World Health Organisation - World Council of Churches -

 

12 December 2002

 

5th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

The purpose of this 5th meeting of the Geneva Process on small arms was to initiate a detailed (and ongoing) discussion on the identification of priority needs related to the implementation of the PoA and the means by which these needs can best be matched with available "resources" - defined broadly as not only financial resources but also human, institutional, knowledge-based, etc. The discussion opened with brief presentations by Marcel Halma (The Netherlands) and Bennie Lombard,Rob Wensley and Nick Sendall (South Africa), who took as their starting-point the report of the “African Conference on the Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms: Needs and Partnerships."

 

Chair:
Dr. David Atwood, Director, Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva (standing in for Peter Batchelor of the Small Arms Survey)

Participants:
Australia - Belgium - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China - Colombia - India - International Action Network on Small Arms - International Committee of the Red Cross - Ireland - Japan - Netherlands - Norway - Peru - Russian Federation - Small Arms Survey - South Africa - Sweden - Switzerland - Thailand - United Nations Development Programme - USA - World Council of Churches - World Health Organisation -

 

6 November 2003

 

4th Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

The 4th meeting of the Geneva Process on small arms discussed overall preparations for the First UN Biennial Meeting to consider implementation of the Programme of Action and, in particular, optional guidelines for states to consult in the process of preparing national reports for the Biennial Metting.

 

Chair:
Ambassador Christopher Westdal, Permanent Representative of Canada to the Conference on Disarmament

Patricipants:
Arias Foundation - Australia - Austria - Belgium - Biting the Bullet/Saferworld - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - China - Colombia - France - India - IANSA - Ireland - Japan - Mali - Norway - Peru - Russian Federation - Small Arms Survey - South Africa - Sweden - Switzerland - Thailand - United Kingdom - UNDP - UNHCHR - USA - World Council of Churches - World Health Organisation -

 

27 August 2002

 

3rd Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

This third meeting of the Geneva process began, as usual, with the Geneva Forum distributing to participants an updated and expanded "composite document" containing detailed information on the implementation of the Programme of Action (PoA) worldwide.  The main purpose of this meeting was to exchange experience in appointing national points of contact to act as liaison between states on matters relating to the implementation of the PoA.  In advance of the meeting, the Geneva Forum had circulated a list of detailed questions on this issue, the responses to which formed the basis of discussion.  The meeting also discussed in detail the resolution on small arms that would be placed before the 57th session of the UN General Assembly later this year, with the Japanese Disarmament Ambassador providing an overview of the content of the draft resolution.  A detailed discussion developed on the importance of beginning preparations as soon as possible for the first biennial meeting in 2003 where states will report on their efforts to date to implement the PoA.  A procedure was agreed by participants, which could allow a chair designate for the biennial meeting to be identified shortly, allowing in turn the UN Department for Disarmament Affairs to assist the chair designate with early and comprehensive preparations.

 

Chair:
Ambassador Christopher Westdal, Permanent Representative of Canada to the Conference on Disarmament

Participants:
Australia - Austria - Belgium - Biting the Bullet - Bulgaria - Canada - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - France - International Committee of the Red Cross - India - Ireland - Japan - Kenya - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway - Small Arms Survey - South Africa - Switzerland - Thailand - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs - UN Development Programme - Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights - UK - USA -

 

25 June 2002

 

2nd Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

This second meeting of the Geneva Process on implementing the UN Programme of Action (PoA) on small arms was the first to be chaired by a government representative.  The purpose of the meeting was to facilitate an initial exchange of national experience in implementing the Programme of Action to date.  To prepare the ground for this discussion, the Geneva Forum distributed at the meeting a composite document containing information related to implementing the PoA gleaned from a variety of sources.  This document will be continually updated as the Geneva Process generates new information and will serve as a useful central source of information relating to PoA implementation.  The UN Department for Disarmament Affairs provided an update of its work concerning the PoA, including a feasibility study being conducted by a group of governmental experts on tracing illicit small arms and the compilation of a list of National Points of Contact on the illicit trade in small arms.  The Small Arms Survey requested feedback from participants on the utility of developing optional guidelines that states could consult in the process of preparing national reports for the 2003 biennial meeting.

 

Chair:
Ambassador Christopher Westdal, Permanent Representative of Canada to the Conference on Disarmament

Participants:
Australia - Bulgaria - Canada - Chile - Colombia - France - India - Ireland - Japan - Kenya - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway - South Africa - Sweden - Switzerland - Thailand - UK - USA - Biting the Bullet - Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - Small Arms Survey - UN Department for Disarmament Affairs - UN Development Programme - Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights - World Health Organisation - Geneva Forum partner organisations -

 

17 May 2002

 

1st Meeting of the Geneva Process to Support Implementation of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms

This meeting marked the beginning of a new Geneva Forum initiative to create a "Geneva Process" in support of implementing the UN Programme of Action on small arms and light weapons adopted in July 2001.  The initiative aims to harness the critical mass of small arms expertise that exists in Geneva by creating a forum of committed actors that would meet on a regular basis in support of individual government, regional and global initiatives towards the implementation of the Programme of Action. The overall intention is that this Geneva-based process will help to build political will for concrete steps to tackle the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons and will create an environment for exchanging information as well as discussing specific needs and steps in the run-up to the first biennial meeting in 2003.  Participants expressed broad support for the initiative and for the purpose and principles outlined in the "framework document" distributed by the Geneva Forum, which acts as core set of principles for the process.